![]() |
|
|||
"Hidden" Rotations
Got the idea from a local college that has been been doing it in their matches, and I am curious to know what your opinions are.
Basically, when this team begins a set in receive, they start in either rotation 1 (setter is RB) or in rotation 6 (setter is RF). However, their alignment for these two rotations is identical. O=====================O l.........MB....................................l l...OPP.........................................l l................O1.............................l l.............................................S..l l.........................O2...........L........l l_______________________________l If they are in Rotation 1, S is RB, O1 is RF, MB is CF, OPP is LF, O2 is LB and L is CB If they are in Rotation 6, L is RB, S is RF, O1 is CF, MB is LF, OPP is LB, and O2 is CB. If my little diagram above is readable, you can see that that alignment is legal in both cases. Obviously, it can be an advantage that your opponent doesn't know whether the setter or the opposite is in the front row. However, if I'm coaching at a club tournament and we line ourselves up like that, then score a first ball kill on a setter dump am I going to have issues with R1's calling BR Attacks on my setter and losing kills to inadvertent whistles and replays? Or how can I remedy this situation? Thanks for your help Last edited by kayla vb; Tue Nov 20, 2012 at 09:33pm. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NHSF "intentional" vs NCAA "flagarent" terminology | Duffman | Basketball | 17 | Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:15pm |
Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
OT: Calling the official a "hater" and "loser" | bainsey | Basketball | 35 | Wed Sep 14, 2011 03:53pm |
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |