R1

bob jenkins · #1 (**permalink**) Thu Apr 15, 2021, 06:54am

12-2-6

bbman · #2 (**permalink**) Thu Apr 15, 2021, 07:09am

Bob, 12-2-6b states 'confer with officials during a requested time out'. To me that would be either the R1 or R2.

FMadera · #3 (**permalink**) Thu Apr 15, 2021, 11:54am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbman

Bob, 12-2-6b states 'confer with officials during a requested time out'. To me that would be either the R1 or R2.

This specifically refers to 11-3-1. This is not a blanket right during all timeouts.

bbman · #4 (**permalink**) Thu Apr 15, 2021, 02:11pm

So, it is permissible for the head coach to request a time out, go over to the R1's stand to question a call (by the R1), as long as it is immediately after that specific call.

FMadera · #5 (**permalink**) Thu Apr 15, 2021, 04:30pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbman

So, it is permissible for the head coach to request a time out, go over to the R1's stand to question a call (by the R1), as long as it is immediately after that specific call.

Yes, but not if it's about judgement. It has to be to discuss a misapplication of a playing rule, not about them not liking your judgement.

Example:
They cannot come over to complain about ball handling.
They *can* come over to discuss if you allowed a back row player to illegally attack in the front zone, if you said it was legal.

In other words...this should almost never happen.

bbman · #6 (**permalink**) Thu Apr 15, 2021, 09:25pm

Got it, Thank you

genetoy71 · #7 (**permalink**) Sat Apr 17, 2021, 03:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by FMadera

Example:
They cannot come over to complain about ball handling.
They *can* come over to discuss if you allowed a back row player to illegally attack in the front zone, if you said it was legal.

In other words...this should almost never happen.

So you're going to let a coach approach the stand and ask you about a back row attack AFTER you signaled legal? Not me. That's judgement.

bob jenkins · #8 (**permalink**) Sat Apr 17, 2021, 04:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by genetoy71

So you're going to let a coach approach the stand and ask you about a back row attack AFTER you signaled legal? Not me. That's judgement.

It might (would) depend on why you said it was legal. "The ball was below the height of the net" -- sure, don't let the coach come over.

"It wasn't a third hit and the player didn't mean to hit it over so it can't be an attack" -- sure, the coach gets to come over.

And, yes, it's a little convoluted given the specific example given. But, the point is accurate.

FMadera · #9 (**permalink**) Sun Apr 18, 2021, 09:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by genetoy71

So you're going to let a coach approach the stand and ask you about a back row attack AFTER you signaled legal? Not me. That's judgement.

No, I meant as in saying that something that is illegal to do was legal to do, when it is not.