|
|||
But she left the field
JV game yesterday. R1 on 3rd, B3 hits a screaming line drive that hits R1 (who is in foul territory) just about belt high. R1 immediately goes down crying in pain. I immediately call foul ball and summon the head coach (1st base box) over. I also call for the trainer to come out.
After a couple minutes she sits up and then is able to jog over to the dugout. At this point, now that I have the injured player taken care of, I ask the HC is he is going to sub for #15 (R1). He goes, I thought she was called out, she was hit with a batted ball. I said, it was a foul ball because she was in foul territory when it hit her (also, the ball had already passed F5 who was playing in expecting a bunt). He then walks over the dugout where #15 is getting a drink and asks if she can continue. She says yes, and comes back out. As I am getting ready to go back behind the plate I hear the opposing coach call time. She comes out and wants to argue that #15 should be out for abandoning the base. I don't recall the exact response, but it was along the lines of, she was an obviously injured player, and I was giving her time to recover, which included going over to get a drink. (The defensive coach could not have heard the offensive coach say he thought she was out based on the volume of the conversation and where it happened). I felt that giving an obviously injured player time to recover does not say she can't go get a drink from the dugout. Opinions? The closest thing in the rulebook I can find is the blood rule. It does not specify that a player who is bleeding must get treatment on the field, only that they must get it treated and cleaned within a reasonable amount of time. |
|
|||
Chap, why would this player be out? The ball was dead, and she went into the team area to be attended to. Even if HC thought runner was out she was not.
This should not be considered "abandoning the base by entering DBT" as in NFHS 8-6-14. Side note: I would not get too involved with summoning particular team personnel to the field. Obviously if the team is not aware that a player needs to be looked at then let a coach know but then back off and let them handle it. Let the coaches call out whoever else they want/need. |
|
|||
Quote:
Had this hit off an ankle or leg, I would not have acted so urgently (even through I had a pitcher suffer a broken kneecap earlier this year with a line drive. When it involves the head, chest or mid-section, I am getting everyone who potentially could be involved in treating this person. In this case, the team in question was a visiting team at a tourney, and was not the home team and also did not have a trainer with them. The host team had a trainer on site, who was actually on his way after he saw the play. |
|
|||
Put the runner back out there.
Let the teams control the teams. Were they not watching? Did they not see what happened? Don't add to it.
__________________
Kill the Clones. Let God sort them out. No one likes an OOJ (Over-officious jerk). Realistic officiating does the sport good. |
|
|||
You are most definitely taking too much "charge" here. You are the umpire - the arbiter of the rules. Do that. You do not need to be involved (directly or indirectly) in this player's care - there are an enormous number of people who will do that. Stay out of that.
You're the guy who needs to stop play (if necessary) and keep his head on a swivel. 99% of the people are focused on this player - you stay focused on everything else. The only ACTIVE thing you might have to do here is help keep other people (like players) away so others can do what they need to do. Regarding your "out for abandoning" question - opposing coach is an idiot. There's no such thing as abandonment during a dead ball.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
You are not a triage professional. Your opinion of the significance of that or any other perceived injury means NOTHING. You have ZERO place in determining what that player needs or doesn't need. By making any decision beyond stopping play, you have assumed and accepted personal liability for your decision. If the trainer does the wrong thing, it is now legally your fault for calling for that trainer. I have stopped responding to your posts, but this one is too significant to ignore in case any other readers are thinking you may be correct. You are completely wrong.
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF |
|
|||
Abandonment? Coach doesn't know what the hell she is talking about. Should we call one of her batter's out if she goes into the dugout after requesting Time to swap out bats or helmets? Where do these people come up with their "expertise" anyway?
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
Quote:
If she didn't need assistance great, I'm glad. If the injury had been severe and potential life threatening, even a few seconds can make a difference. I would much rather error on the side of asking the trainer to come to the field, rather than having a player seriously injured or killed on my field. Maybe you can live with a player being seriously injured or killed on your field, I however am not the same way. Let me end my portion of this discussion by asking you this. If you were umpiring and you witnessed the pitcher take a line drive off the face, but you knew the coach wasn't paying attention, what you would do? (I have seen it happen, the coach was working with another athlete and had her back turned to the field, when the pitcher was hit with a batted ball in the face, thankfully not hard). |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
In spite of my respect for most of you, I will still stop play and get someone's attention if I see a potentially serious injury or risk.
I think ignoring it is neglect.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
In the case of the OP, everyone else already saw it. Being the only person on the field not focused on the injury is not neglect. Might be different if someone was hurt on the field, and further play could injure them more, or if you were the only one that saw it.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
Nope, the umpire's job is to make the call. It is a dead ball. If the player's team isn't watching the game, what are you umpiring, practice? Unless you are qualified and licensed to administer medical aid, the most you may want to do is "suggest" that someone from the team may want to check on their player. The ambulance chasers, insurance companies and cowardly judges have made it a risky proposition in attempting to help our fellow human being and when it comes down to it, my family comes first.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
" "suggest" that someone from the team may want to check on their player." equals "stop play and get someone's attention "
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I left one out there | Adam | Basketball | 18 | Sun Dec 16, 2007 04:15pm |
Where did they go? They left ref!!! | Tweet | Basketball | 5 | Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:56pm |
Base left too soon. | Illini_Ref | Baseball | 19 | Sat May 19, 2007 07:57pm |
Left Out To Dry | tmp44 | Basketball | 8 | Wed Feb 02, 2005 09:00am |
Field goal attempts that hit the cameras on field goal posts | Barney72 | Football | 3 | Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:21pm |