The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 13, 2015, 12:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 6
Collision or no collision?

Bases are full, ball hit slowly in front of F1, F1 fields throws to F2 at the plate. With foot on plate F2 is knocked down just as the ball reaches glove. What is the call?

Last edited by big poppa 7; Wed May 13, 2015 at 01:02pm.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 13, 2015, 12:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Northeast Nebraska
Posts: 776
With any bang-bang judgment play, I would have to be there and see it. Might be interference, might be obstruction, might be nothing. There are about a hundred factors that need to be considered in this seemingly simple case play.

Who knocked down F3? If it was a runner, was it intentional or accidental? Did she attempt to avoid the fielder? Has she already scored? How many outs are there? Was it a slow roller or a lazy pop fly that drops in front of F1? What side of the plate is F3 standing on? Why is the first baseman covering home? What level of play/ruleset? Was the throw offline, pulling F3 into the path of a runner? Did F3 obstruct the runner before F3 was in possession of the ball? Etc.
__________________
Powder blue since 1998. Longtime forum lurker.
Umpiring Goals: Call the knee strike accurately (getting the low pitch since 2017)/NCAA D1 postseason/ISF-WBSC Certification/Nat'l Indicator Fraternity(completed)
"I'm gonna call it ASA for the foreseeable future. You all know what I mean."

Last edited by teebob21; Wed May 13, 2015 at 12:43pm.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 13, 2015, 12:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 6
Whoops

F2 not F3
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 13, 2015, 12:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 6
F2 had right foot on plate and left foot in front of plate. U12 Rec ball. Throw was not offline. Intentional or not is debatable! Internal House rule states that runner must try to avoid collision when approaching base either by sliding or touching opposite side of bag in comparison to fielder. Obstruction was made after possession but before complete control.

Last edited by big poppa 7; Wed May 13, 2015 at 12:57pm.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 13, 2015, 09:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 70
Safe!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 14, 2015, 10:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by big poppa 7 View Post
F2 had right foot on plate and left foot in front of plate. U12 Rec ball. Throw was not offline. Intentional or not is debatable! Internal House rule states that runner must try to avoid collision when approaching base either by sliding or touching opposite side of bag in comparison to fielder. Obstruction was made after possession but before complete control.
I could be a pedant here, or might see things differently, but if F2 is making a catch at home with her body (as you describe) sounding like it's in a good spot, can obstruction be made after possession?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 14, 2015, 11:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 6
Okay I guess my question should be when is it illegal for a runner to collide with a fielder making a play on a ball?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 14, 2015, 11:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsnalex View Post
I could be a pedant here, or might see things differently, but if F2 is making a catch at home with her body (as you describe) sounding like it's in a good spot, can obstruction be made after possession?
No, that is not possible.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 14, 2015, 11:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by big poppa 7 View Post
Bases are full, ball hit slowly in front of F1, F1 fields throws to F2 at the plate. With foot on plate F2 is knocked down just as the ball reaches glove. What is the call?
Well, it could be a good news, bad news situation.

Good news, you score; Bad news, your gone.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 15, 2015, 06:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 763
Knocking a player down is not grounds for ejection. Doing so with great force may be if it is malicious.

There is also no such thing as "just as..." in timing with these plays under most rule sets. She either had possession or she didn't. PERIOD. It's the umpire's responsibility to figure that part out.
__________________
Kill the Clones. Let God sort them out.
No one likes an OOJ (Over-officious jerk).
Realistic officiating does the sport good.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 15, 2015, 07:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by EsqUmp View Post
Knocking a player down is not grounds for ejection. Doing so with great force may be if it is malicious.
Maybe, maybe not. If a player intentionally contacts a player hard enough to knock them off their feet, that player needs to leave whether it was with great force, malicious or whatever.

It is like pulling the trigger on a gun. Once you do, no matter what the intention, you no longer have control over that projectile(s). Same here. The intent may not have been to injure the player, but that is something beyond one's control and there is no room for it in amateur ball.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 15, 2015, 07:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by EsqUmp View Post
Knocking a player down is not grounds for ejection. Doing so with great force may be if it is malicious.



There is also no such thing as "just as..." in timing with these plays under most rule sets. She either had possession or she didn't. PERIOD. It's the umpire's responsibility to figure that part out.

My intent on the "just as" was so everyone could picture the play as being close. The fielder was making a play. She wasn't blocking the plate waiting for the play. But I know the runner has a right to the base too. So with 12 year old girls was this collision where the girl was knocked off her feet hard, a legal collision? Is the runner out or safe? And if collisions at this age in rec ball are not to be tolerated what is the penalty?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 15, 2015, 10:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,241
The question I would have on this is where on the plate was the left foot. If it was on the back corner of the plate and the runner had nowhere to touch on the plate, I don't think I have anything on the runner because I'm not penalizing a runner for running into a defensive player who is blocking the plate (unless I deem the runners action to be malicious).

Now if F2 has her foot on the front edge of the plate and the runner has the entire plate to touch but still manages to run into F2 with enough force to knock her down, it is much more possible that I have malicious contact.

If the run scores or not depends on if the runner had touched the plate when the contact occurred. If she had, then the run counts and I likely have an ejection. If the runner hadn't touched yet, no run scores, and the malicious contact gets the player an early exit.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 16, 2015, 08:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 763
When the ball, runner and the defensive player arrive at the same time and place, and contact is made, the umpire should not invoke the crash rule, interference, or obstruction. This is merely incidental contact, or as some persons commonly call, "a wreck."


For an ejection, the conduct must be flagrant.
__________________
Kill the Clones. Let God sort them out.
No one likes an OOJ (Over-officious jerk).
Realistic officiating does the sport good.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 17, 2015, 05:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 6
What if the defensive player was there waiting?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Collision in the Key iref4him Basketball 10 Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:39pm
WBC -- B/R misses 1B, collision, B/R out johnnyg08 Baseball 10 Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:57pm
Result of Collision at First dnorthen Baseball 11 Sun Apr 27, 2008 08:08am
F2/R1 collision or is it obs? chas Softball 4 Thu Mar 24, 2005 09:08am
Collision at first SF Softball 2 Sun Oct 03, 2004 07:55pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1