|
|||
Well, I got evaluated on Sunday in an exhibition game at a players development camp. Several things went wrong, of course, one being distracted by a base ump that was not signalling any outs or safes (that's a long story in itself ... I'll spare you that one).
Bases loaded, no outs ... I signal to the base ump that the infield fly is a possibility ... base ump actually responds appropriately. Pow! Big hit ... looks like it's going well into left field !! Brain thinks " Hey, wait a moment, that looks like it might be an infield fly !!! No, it was hit way too hard. Yikes, the wind is holding the ball up over the shortstop !! Call it !! Call it !!! " Vocal section fails to listen to brain. Ball drops next to SS. Play continues. Players/coaches seem oblivious. I look to Mr. Evaluator, hoping to beg forgiveness but he is busy writing me up!!! (And, of course, the obligatory nasty note about failing to wear those official $90 umpire pants.) Talking to some other umps that day, several had similar stories about bad decisions on infield flies ... some funny ones about yelling out messed up versions of "Infield Fly, if fair batter is out!" Sympathy, please.
__________________
bobbrix |
|
|||
Quote:
This scenario presents a few possibilities. Number one, the fact that it landed near the SS without being caught may be an indication that this particular batted ball could not be caught with ordinary effort by the SS. Second, this is a correctable situation. As long as you do it before the next pitch, you can still rule that BR out. It takes a little humility, but it is the proper call. You didn't mention whether any runners were ruled out, so I will not enter the "in jeopardy" area recently discussed in another thread. As an umpire, I don't care what order it is said as long as the words "infield fly", "if fair" and "out" are included in the call.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
$90 canadian = ~$64 american ... i should have noted that ... what would "you american folks" pay for official umpire pants ????
(i do wear dark blue pants, just not official official ones) yes, i failed to correct the call, too yes, even with the wind, it ended up an ordinary effort fly ball yes, the SS picked up the ball and threw the runner out at 3rd base ... again, other that me and the evaluator, no one seemed to be aware of the missed call just blew it altogether ... shameful
__________________
bobbrix |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
I've finally got you on something--LOL, it's defecation not defication.
__________________
Elaine "Lady Blue" Metro Atlanta ASA (retired) Georgia High School NFHS (retired) Mom of former Travel Player National Indicator Fraternity 1995 |
|
|||
Where is the spell checker
when you need it?
__________________
"There are no superstar calls. We don't root for certain teams. We don't cheat. But sometimes we just miss calls." - Joe Crawford |
|
|||
Re: Where is the spell checker
Quote:
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Re: Re: Where is the spell checker
Quote:
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
pants, not "official"
$30 at Sears, plus alteration to take in the waist.
Still don't know what makes them "official" or "base pants".
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
Re: pants, not
Quote:
However, I have seen some umpires who wear off-the-rack pants that just look vastly out of place. They are obviously NOT uniform pants. I can say there is a noticeable difference in thickness of fabric, tailoring for athletic use (i.e. seams that can "take it", lots of wide belt loops, etc.) between the Cliff Keen umpire pants and your typical K-Mart fare. The lengendary Fechheimers were even better.
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
Re: Re: pants, not
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dakota
Quote:
Do you know something I don't know?
__________________
Scott It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it. |
|
|||
OK, I guess we locals just don't know as much as you nationals, or just aren't interested in our partners' pants (other than those semi-charcoal and almost royal blue things). I ordered a pair of navy from ASA once and I hate the waistband, so maybe that's when I got off the track.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
Re: pants, not
Quote:
The Sears pants are great. $30.00 regular price and 19.50 when on sale....Blue are grey normally will match whatever your partner is wearing, unless he happends to shop "Wally - World" glen
__________________
glen _______________________________ "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." --Mark Twain. |
|
|||
I still feel that you cannot beat the "real" umpire pants for wear and tear, not to mention looks. To me it is worth the extra few bucks!
__________________
Scott It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it. |
Bookmarks |
|
|