The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 07, 2014, 04:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
I think we need Steve or Irish to jump in here.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 07, 2014, 07:08pm
Statistician/Ref Hybrid
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 1,044
Years ago, there was a NFHS case play that allowed for the possibility of a train wreck. I just don't recall what year. I'd be curious to know the NFHS perspective on this.
__________________
"Be kind whenever possible. It is always possible." – Dalai Lama

The center of attention as the lead & trail. – me
Games officiated: 525 Basketball · 76 Softball · 16 Baseball
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 08, 2014, 11:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
I think we need Steve or Irish to jump in here.
To my knowledge, there has been no change in that ASA ruling; it is consistent with NCAA and NFHS that this could be a "no call", unless one or the other does something out of the standard expectation.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 20, 2014, 11:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 150
Collision

The 2014 Umpire Manuel still has a difficult situations section that talks about collisions on page 253. Collision: contact between defensive and offensive players does not mean that OBS or INT occurred. The field is laid out in such a manner that it puts the defensive and offensive players on a collision course.

Consider the following:
1) did the offensive player alter their direction in a way to draw contact with the defensive player in an attempt to draw and OBS call?

2) did the defensive player alter their attempt to field the ball to draw an INT call?

3) could the defensive player actually make a play?

4) did the defensive player have possession of the ball?


The book says for us to consider the aforementioned factors in making a decision. It further says for us to rely on a thorough knowledge of INT and OBS to make a prompt and accurate decision.

In considering the situation you described, it could be INT, OBS or a collision/wreck. If you judged that the catcher never had a play and that F5 clearly had the only play on the ball, then OBS would likely be the proper call for F2 OBS the BR. We should not be having "do overs".

Last edited by txtrooper; Sun Jul 20, 2014 at 11:43am.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 20, 2014, 07:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve View Post
To my knowledge, there has been no change in that ASA ruling; it is consistent with NCAA and NFHS that this could be a "no call", unless one or the other does something out of the standard expectation.
I agree. BTW, this type of play in which I first heard a clinician clearly note that if both players are going what they are supposed to do (that means the BR runner and catcher chasing the ball) all is good. However, pushing, tripping or knocking down the opponent isn't what you are supposed to do.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1