![]() |
|
|
|||
Hit by pitch, without contact?
I read this write-up of the Baylor/Georgia Super Regional. I didn't see the game, but apparently "hit by pitch, sans contact" is a thing? What the hell is ESPN talking about? Can I get a citation from someone? (My college rulebook suffered mortal injury at the hands of my 2 year old, so I can't look it up right now.)
Quote:
I found the official box score too. Sure enough, 1-for-1 with 2 BB and 1 HBP for Hugo. HR in the 1st inning, HBP on 2-0 pitch in the 3rd inning. Is the quirk in the rules "they plunked her with the third pitch", a la rule 11.15.1? Georgia vs Baylor - DI Softball | NCAA.com Last edited by teebob21; Tue May 27, 2014 at 08:02pm. Reason: link to box score |
|
|||
I couldn't find anything in the NCAA book that allows for a scoring of a HBP without the ball physically contacting the batter or her clothing.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
11.15.1 simply says: A batter is awarded first base when a pitched ball, neither swung at nor called a strike, is entirely within the batter's box and it strikes the batter or her clothing. no attempt to avoid being hit by the pitch is required; however, the batter may not obviously try to get hit by the pitch.
There is no quirk. There is no mention of a HBP award without getting hit by the ball. Not sure what is being referred to in the article.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
Start watching about the 56:00 mark. The first pitch was an intentional ball, and the catcher threw the ball to the third baseman for Ball Two (Rule 10.16). The sequence was repeated on the next pitch to achieve Ball Four. I have no idea about the Effect of 10.16 - why it did not come into play. Because an Intentional Base on Balls requires four pitches to be delivered to the batter, there must be something in the Scoring Rules that treats this scenario as a Hit Batter. |
|
|||
Quote:
"In addition, on the first offense, the offending player shall be warned. On subsequent offenses, the offender shall be ejected from the game." I did not see the catcher get ejected. Also... EXCEPTION: Intentionally violating the rule in order to walk the batter without pitching shall not result in a ball being awarded to the batter.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
I think the situation is actually very simple. The umpires, who likely have not faced this type situation at the college level, kicked the call. The scorer had to put something in the scorebook, and since it can't count as an intentional walk since 4 pitches were not delivered, found the only thing they could think of to indicate the award of first base without the 4 pitches being delivered. NCAA scoring rules, IIRC, require the count to be listed on the play by play, so you can't have a walk with B-B. I think this was a scorer trying to go on the fly with a situation nobody has even seen. I've never seen this, nor have I ever heard of this happening at any level, let alone the highest level of college softball.
|
|
|||
Steve? This was a Super Regional, so you would think ... . But it could be that simple. And if the sequence should not have been allowed, then yes, the scorekeeper has to manufacture something out of thin air.
Last edited by Jake26; Thu May 29, 2014 at 09:51am. |
|
|||
Quote:
The scorekeeper is required to keep an accurate account of the game. Putting down a HBP when that never happened is derelict in the scorekeeper's duties. Someone given the responsibility for keeping the official scoring of an NCAA Super-Regional is going to be very knowledgeable of the rules. Likely, he/she would annotate "B*" for the second ball, and then "*-10.16 Violation" somewhere on the scoresheet to clarify this was not an ordinary pitch out of the strike zone.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASA Slow Pitch/Fast Pitch Rules Differences | IRISHMAFIA | Softball | 8 | Fri Jan 13, 2012 07:27pm |
Fast pitch - batter "catches" the pitch | Dakota | Softball | 16 | Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:06am |
Bats: Slow-pitch v. Fast-pitch | Blu_IN | Softball | 3 | Tue Jul 12, 2005 12:12pm |
Slow Pitch, Fast Pitch, Baseball...they are all the same... | Bandit | Softball | 5 | Mon Jun 14, 2004 07:00pm |