B/r goes to 1st-but it's not a 3KD

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by BretMan

From the ASA website:

A common item for discussion among umpires is game management. The discussion centers around ways umpires can achieve a game without issues. Sometimes the discussion leaves out an important detail … “Game Control”. Game Control can be described as taking charge of an unusual situation before the situation results in chaos. A good tool for game control and game management is often referred to as “preventive umpiring”. In fact, if umpires use preventive umpiring techniques then game control and game management would become easier. Therefore, good “Game Control” leads to good “Game Management”.

Umpires should not use the term game control as a tool for an umpire to be involved every situation occurring on the ball field. Game control should seldom, if never, be noticed: Example, if we have a batter-runner who starts to run to 1B thinking ball four has been awarded; the umpire should call “time” and bring the batter back to the plate. The same holds true with runners on 1B and 2B and the batter takes off for 1B thinking it is ball four causing runners to advance. To eliminate confusion for both the offense and the defense, the umpire should call “time.” An umpire with good game control who gives a loud “time” can prevent the chaos before it gets a chance to start.


Just call time! End the chaos!

And every single clinician I've ever discussed this with agrees this advice is horrible.

[CecilOne]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

And every single clinician I've ever discussed this with agrees this advice is horrible.

Especially if it causes a disadvantage to either team , or is that what you meant?

[BretMan]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

And every single clinician I've ever discussed this with agrees this advice is horrible.

And I agree with every single clinician you've ever discussed it with.

But...does that mean you can ignore it, if it is a directive from the ASA "higher-ups"? When is a published directive the letter of the law and when is it just friendly advice?

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by BretMan

And I agree with every single clinician you've ever discussed it with.

But...does that mean you can ignore it, if it is a directive from the ASA "higher-ups"? When is a published directive the letter of the law and when is it just friendly advice?

I report to my bosses. I will call it as my bosses tell me to call it.

They report to their bosses.