The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 22, 2014, 11:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Thank God we live in a free and democratic......er, never mind.

Here is the original e-mail from OKC:

From: John Miller [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 11:59 AM
To: John Miller
Cc: YZ - Department Heads; zz - RegisterASA Staff
Subject: ASA Mandatory Background Check Policy For 2015 Season



Good Morning Council Members,

I hope you all enjoyed Easter yesterday. This is the last email for actions taken by the ASA Board of Directors at their March 29 board meeting.

ASA has in place a background check screening process to help keep our youth players safe from those that seek to harm them. Over the last five years ASA has run more than 300,000 background check reports in an effort to keep those that would want to harm our youth players out of our program.

There are state/metro associations that require their umpires and administrators to pass a background check in order to umpire or serve as a team or league administrators so these associations are setting the standard.

During the March 29 board meeting the ASA Board of Directors established a national policy for background checking council members, umpires and RegisterASA team/league administrators. This policy would take affect starting with the 2015 season.

Council members, umpires working Junior Olympic Championship play and all RegisterASA administrators shall pass an ASA background check.

Now that the state/metro associations have the choice of starting their Junior Olympic season on either September 1 or January 1 those starting on September 1 and using RegisterASA would have to have their RegisterASA admins pass a background check before being able to register their individuals for a team or league. Those same September 1 state/metro associations that would schedule JO championship qualifiers after September 1 would need to background check those umpires that would be working JO championship play.

Only an ASA background check report will be allowed to verify that a council member, umpire or RegisterASA admin has passed a background check. This must be done in case ASA has to prove that a council member, umpire or RegisterASA admin has passed a background check in any litigation brought before ASA. The background check reports will have to be run annually.

As any new policy is put into place there will be many questions. Please direct those questions to me and I will get them answered for you.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 22, 2014, 10:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 3 hrs east of the western time zone
Posts: 895
Can anyone answer this ????

In your state, if you are working SP only are you required to have a BG check. In my state they are requiring everyone regardless of fast ( youth ) or just slow ( adult )......it makes no sense unless they are looking for issues non child related......
__________________
Go ugly early, avoid the rush !!!!

Last edited by Multiple Sports; Tue Apr 22, 2014 at 10:52pm.
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 22, 2014, 10:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,241
Maybe it is time for one organization to oversee all background checks for all umpires/coaches/volunteers working with youth sports.

Doing multiple sports for multiple organizations, I have to have a background check run for each different organization. It does get a bit tiresome, and costly.

Add in the fact that I work in education, and am required to be fingerprinted for work purposes and have regular background checks run as well.

Maybe one organization handling all background checks would just make things so much easier.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 23, 2014, 09:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by chapmaja View Post
...Add in the fact that I work in education, and am required to be fingerprinted for work purposes and have regular background checks run as well. ...
It seems every other week there is another teacher in the news for a sexual offense with a student.

So, how well is that fingerprinting and background checking working out for the education establishment?

Clearly, (well, clearly to ME), this is all about liability limitation for the organizations themselves and very little about protecting anyone from anything.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 23, 2014, 12:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by chapmaja View Post
Maybe one organization handling all background checks would just make things so much easier.
NO NO NO. Please think about the effect of centralizing personal information.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 23, 2014, 12:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
Clearly, (well, clearly to ME), this is all about liability limitation for the organizations themselves and very little about protecting anyone from anything.
And ASA even says so.
"This must be done in case ASA has to prove that a council member, umpire or RegisterASA admin has passed a background check in any litigation brought before ASA. "
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 23, 2014, 07:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
And ASA even says so.
"This must be done in case ASA has to prove that a council member, umpire or RegisterASA admin has passed a background check in any litigation brought before ASA. "
And when someone is certified by a sanctioning body through a BI, does that now make them liable since apparently their system failed?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weird non-game incidents on the court Mark Padgett Basketball 9 Sun Dec 21, 2008 05:40pm
background check OHBBREF Basketball 10 Fri Nov 07, 2008 07:58pm
Background Checks Cub42 Baseball 29 Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:06am
Background Checks SergioJ Softball 20 Mon Feb 12, 2007 07:17am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:31pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1