![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
Quote:
I ask "What specificially would you like me to ask my partner?" Depending on that reply, my next line is "Here is what I can ask: 1) Did she pull or not pull her foot? 2) Did she bobble or not bobble the ball? 3) Did your angle show a clearly missed tag, or did you see (or hear) an obvious tag I didn't. Unless I have already indicated I know I was blocked or had the wrong position or angle for how this play developed (or NCAA required 'help' at first or third on a pickoff), I cannot ask if my partner has a different judgment as to if the runner beat the throw (or tag) or vice versa; nor can my partner make me unsee what I saw, because the rulebook and manual are clear that this is my call, and judgment calls cannot be overturned by another umpire. So, with those guidelines, what do you want me to ask my partner?"
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
Quote:
If the response is along the lines of, "I think my player beat the throw" or anything else that is basically disagreeing with my call, I respond with a shortened version of Steve's post... Coach, just becuase you don't like the call is not a valid reason for me to consult with my partner(s). Let's play ball.
__________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all that's important! |
|
|||
First request - brief statement of fact.
Second request - "Coach, what FACT do you think my partner witnessed that I did not, or are you questioning my judgment, if the latter, then the rules dictate the next course of action." |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|