![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
21 years... and I've never ever had a single issue stem from my leaving the bat alone. So why not leave it alone?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
"9.8 Equipment Blocked Ball 9.8.1 No loose equipment (that is, gloves/mitts, hats, helmets, jackets, balls, on-deck batter’s bats), miscellaneous items, or detached parts of a player’s uniform, other than that being legally used in the game at the time, should be within playable territory as it could cause a blocked ball. Official equipment that may be within playable territory with no effect includes the batter’s bat, the catcher’s mask or helmet, umpire paraphernalia, and any helmet that has inadvertently fallen off the head of an offensive or defensive player during the course of play." So, at least in NCAA play, an ODB's warm-up bat lying in the circle is specifically listed as loose equipment and may be liable for a blocked ball call. As for ASA, Rule Supplement #17 specifically states what is not considered loose equipment: "Official equipment which may be in live ball territory with no penalty includes the batter's bat, the catcher's mask, umpire paraphernalia, a helmet which has inadvertently fallen off an offensive or defensive player during play or any equipment belonging to a person assigned to the game." It could be inferred from that statement that the ODB's warm-up bat is considered loose equipment, since it's not listed as official equipment, unless the vagueness of "any equipment belonging to a person assigned to the game" allows for that interpretation. Frankly, I have no idea what that last clause means. NFHS is even more vague. 1-8-3 only mentions the batter's discarded bat and the catcher's helmet/mask as examples of equipment not considered loose. Bottom line: I would considered a warm-up bat on the ground as loose equipment in FED and ASA play. The ODB should be able to hang on to it during the course of play.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
Quote:
I think it again comes down to "when in Rome". As far as the groups and clinics I've been to, the subject either has NOT been specifically addressed our the advice was to leave it alone. To be honest, I think it is more the concern for appearance of favoritism (which like it ir not I have seen under the silliest of circumstances), than it is the safety issue. The bat is legally there and its being there our not being there can affect the play. If you move it, you have given one team an advantage (possibly). That's my take. If I find myself worrying for the people who wrote that directive, I'll consider moving the bat. |
|
|||
yes
__________________
Kill the Clones. Let God sort them out. No one likes an OOJ (Over-officious jerk). Realistic officiating does the sport good. |
|
|||
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
It broke when you dropped it, not when I moved it.
![]()
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Scott It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Scott It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it. |
|
|||
Give me a break. I really hope you're joking. PS: Tell your catcher she can't drop her equipment and obstruct the runner.
__________________
Kill the Clones. Let God sort them out. No one likes an OOJ (Over-officious jerk). Realistic officiating does the sport good. |
|
|||
Gotta love it:
For the most part, people are advocating leaving the bat alone, saying they have never had a problem. I'm not sure how they are defining "problem" but I'll take their word for it. What I'm saying is that I know thousands of umpires who move the bat and none of us have had a "problem." Unless you consider someone saying, "thanks for getting the bat out of the way" a problem. So why are those who don't move the bat so adamant that those who do move it are wrong? Is it a "that's baseball" argument? I love that one. Why don't you all ask your associations to put it in writing NOT to move the bat? I can't wait for someone to say that not everything has to be put in a rule book or a manual. After all, it's not like ASA kills trees telling us to make sure we keep a stand-by plumber and electrician ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Kill the Clones. Let God sort them out. No one likes an OOJ (Over-officious jerk). Realistic officiating does the sport good. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Charles Johnson Jr NFHS Class #1 softball/baseball ASA/USSSA Dayton, Ohio I have been umpiring so long that it was called Rounders when I started. ![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
The players are there to play their game on their field with their equipment, let them play the game on their field with their equipment. Then there is always the question of why is the PU hanging around the plate while there is an on-going play.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moving from ASA to NSA | bwbuddy | Softball | 6 | Tue May 06, 2008 06:23pm |
Moving On | Odd Duck | Basketball | 5 | Mon Feb 11, 2008 03:18pm |
Moving | Fozzie | Softball | 5 | Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:48am |
moving up | xxssmen | Basketball | 23 | Tue Mar 02, 2004 01:49pm |
Moving Up? | fletch_irwin_m | Basketball | 5 | Mon Sep 02, 2002 12:42pm |