The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 11, 2003, 11:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4
Send a message via AIM to David Ruest
Thumbs up

Anybody see the play where Mike Bordick was called out for failure to Re-touch first after the ball was thrown out of play? Bordick on first, a line drive deflects off the pitchers back and is caught by the third baseman who then throws to first in an effort to double off Bordick. He throws the ball out of play and Bordick is awarded third but never re-touches first. After the ball is made live, the defense appeals and Bordick is called out. ESPN had lots of pictures of managers/coaches searching the rulebook. It was great!!!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 11, 2003, 11:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
I'm surprised that Major League managers and coaches had to search the rule book for that one!

Did the announcers know the rule right away?
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 11, 2003, 12:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally posted by greymule
I'm surprised that Major League managers and coaches had to search the rule book for that one!

Did the announcers know the rule right away?
They must be the only coaches who bring rule books to games.
First, let's establish whether the announcers knew the rule at all, then worry about right away. Maybe they can tell the LL announcer (Miller ?) that the hands are not part of the bat.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 11, 2003, 02:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
According to the thread in the baseball section, the appeal that the umpires upheld was at 2B, though the base left too soon was 1B. Since Bordick had advanced to 3B, and since there was no mention of his missing 2B on the way, I don't see how this could be. Baseball or softball, all codes, I believe the appeal has to be at the base of the infraction, not at an intervening base the runner would have to touch to correct the infraction.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 11, 2003, 04:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
I saw the replay on ESPN today. When Bordick was awarded 3B he looked confused as to how to get there. He by-passed 2B on the way to 3B. That's why the appeal to 2B.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 11, 2003, 05:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by bluezebra
I saw the replay on ESPN today. When Bordick was awarded 3B he looked confused as to how to get there. He by-passed 2B on the way to 3B. That's why the appeal to 2B.

Bob
Sounds like one of those, "you're out for being stupid" scenarios to me.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 12, 2003, 08:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Sounds like one of those, "you're out for being stupid" scenarios to me. [/B]
One of my favorite rules !
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 13, 2003, 09:18pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Both the umpires' union and Jim Evans, in private emails, say that the appeal was mishandled on the field and the only appealable base was the original base. Amazing candor.

Rich
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1