|
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 09:54pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Illegall mitt use pre 2006 rule change
What "was" the EFFECT for a defender illegally using a mitt. Coach had choice of accepting the result of the play OR ???
|
|
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 09:59pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
a do-over. One of the two (?) times in the book where a "do over" was permitted.
BTW, that is STILL the effect.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|
|
Tue Jul 09, 2013, 11:26am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker
|
|
Tue Jul 09, 2013, 11:43am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Way back in the day I had a pitcher field a grounder and retired the batter wearing a catchers mitt. Speaking two weeks ago to some Ump's in my group they still thought this rule was current. I could not remember what the solution was when this would happen. As you know anyone can use a mitt now in ASA.
|
|
Tue Jul 09, 2013, 10:13pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OBR's 2006 Rule Changes (23 of 'em!) | UMP25 | Baseball | 13 | Wed May 17, 2006 10:55pm |
| NFHS 8-10.14 Change for 2006 | WestMichBlue | Softball | 0 | Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:34pm |
| 2006 NF Rule Changes | rdfox | Football | 10 | Thu Mar 09, 2006 04:57pm |
| 2006 Rule Changes Posted | SRW | Softball | 1 | Mon Nov 28, 2005 09:09pm |
| ASA 2006 Rule Changes | IRISHMAFIA | Softball | 17 | Tue Nov 22, 2005 05:19pm |
Linear Mode
