![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
This is the only time the word "engaged" or any form of that word, is noted in MLB rules:
BENCH OR DUGOUT is the seating facilities reserved for players, substitutes and other team members in uniform when they are not actively engaged on the playing field.What you defined is clearly a blocked ball in all games with which I am familiar (U-trip not one of them). Whether it is INT is purely up to the umpire and I do not believe it is absolute.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
|
I'd answer, but to be honest, there are a LOT of cases in which USSSA has a "well, you know what we meant" approach towards writing their rules. I've had one hell of a time getting straight, rule-based interpretations from them.
Not trying to mock the association, but... well... Yeah, it is what it is. In ASA, a ball striking the on-deck batter would be considered a blocked ball. If it did not interfere with the defense's ability to make a play on the runner, the ball just becomes dead. If it did interfere, then the ball is dead and the runner being played upon is out.
__________________
Dave I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views! Screw green, it ain't easy being blue! I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
We had a very lengthy discussion about this very topic a couple years ago. The on-deck batter is allowed on the field, but is not considered to be "engaged in the game." An on-deck batter is not required to even be on the field. They can come straight from the dugout to the plate if they so desire.
__________________
Dave I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views! Screw green, it ain't easy being blue! I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
|
Quote:
If so, you would have seen the OP raised this issue and stated that according to MLB, any player on the roster was considered as "engaged" in the game. I was just pointing out that MLB rules do not make that statement.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| usssa |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Blocked Ball - Defense Question | Texasbock | Softball | 4 | Tue Feb 01, 2011 02:29pm |
| Interference / Blocked Ball / Nothing | NCASAUmp | Softball | 11 | Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:27pm |
| On-deck batter and blocked Ball or live Ball? | rwest | Softball | 13 | Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:49pm |
| Blocked Ball vs. Nothing | NCASAUmp | Softball | 4 | Tue May 13, 2008 03:48pm |
| Blocked Ball Question | Stair-Climber | Softball | 2 | Tue May 04, 2004 12:13pm |