The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 23, 2012, 11:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
NCAA pitching

What is the rational for the pitcher not touching hands together being just a ball and not an IP, as in other codes?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 23, 2012, 11:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
What is the rational for the pitcher not touching hands together being just a ball and not an IP, as in other codes?
My guess, if the pitcher never puts her hands together, it is a violation of the 10-10-5 (well, the "5" in this case) and the penalty is only a ball on the batter.

Seems consistent that way.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 23, 2012, 01:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Can't be an illegal pitch if it's not a pitch, can it?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 23, 2012, 01:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 741
Send a message via Yahoo to MNBlue
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
What is the rational for the pitcher not touching hands together being just a ball and not an IP, as in other codes?
Are you referring to this:

Quote:
10-2-3 After receiving the catcher's signal, the pitcher's hands must come together in view of the plate umpire for not more than five seconds.

Note: The hands do not have to come to a complete stop and, therefore, may be moving during the touch.

EFFECT—A ball is awarded to the batter.
__________________
Mark

NFHS, NCAA, NAFA
"If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?" Anton Chigurh - "No Country for Old Men"
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 23, 2012, 05:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 937
Continuing with MN Blue's reply......
or are you referring to 10.18, Time Allowed Between Pitches?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 23, 2012, 06:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Can't be an illegal pitch if it's not a pitch, can it?
Depends on the association
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 763
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Can't be an illegal pitch if it's not a pitch, can it?
Defacing the ball is typically an illegal pitch the instant it happens. No pitch need be thrown.
__________________
Kill the Clones. Let God sort them out.
No one likes an OOJ (Over-officious jerk).
Realistic officiating does the sport good.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 23, 2012, 11:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Can't be an illegal pitch if it's not a pitch, can it?
Throwing to a base with a foot on the pitcher's plate would be considered an IP in ASA. No pitch is thrown.
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 24, 2012, 09:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp View Post
Throwing to a base with a foot on the pitcher's plate would be considered an IP in ASA. No pitch is thrown.
He was asking for the logic of why the NCAA rule is the way it is. I did not mean to imply my statement applied across the board or in all rulesets.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 24, 2012, 09:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 741
Send a message via Yahoo to MNBlue
If CecilOne is referring to 10-2-3, I believe it is being interpretted incorrectly. The rule is addressing having the hands together for more than 5 seconds. If that happens, we have a dead ball and award a ball to the batter, with no IP called. The stipulation for bringing the hands together is in the NCAA rulebook and if not adhered to will result in an IP.

That was why I asked to what CecilOne was referring.
__________________
Mark

NFHS, NCAA, NAFA
"If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?" Anton Chigurh - "No Country for Old Men"
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 24, 2012, 11:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by MNBlue View Post
Are you referring to this:
Quote:
10-2-3 After receiving the catcher's signal, the pitcher's hands must come together in view of the plate umpire for not more than five seconds.

Note: The hands do not have to come to a complete stop and, therefore, may be moving during the touch.

EFFECT—A ball is awarded to the batter.

Yes.

So, the above responses imply there is an interpretation that the effect only applies to more than 5 sec, not to "no touch" at all.

If the ref to 10-10-5 is really 10-5, it does not literally say the hands must touch, but the windup starts with the touch and not twice; so that means there can be no windup and 10-6 is the pitch starts with separation, so ther had to be a touch to separate. OK, thanks.

Still wonder why the 10.2.3 effect is different.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 24, 2012, 01:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 741
Send a message via Yahoo to MNBlue
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
Quote:
Still wonder why the 10.2.3 effect is different.
My limited understanding of this rule is that it is in the book to prevent F1 from taking too much time once she brings her hands together and then the batter asking for time.

Once the hands are brought together, the batter knows that F1 will deliver the ball in 5 seconds or less.

Delay of Game prevention.

I believe.
__________________
Mark

NFHS, NCAA, NAFA
"If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?" Anton Chigurh - "No Country for Old Men"
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 26, 2012, 09:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 763
The reason for a different penalty is based upon the severity of the infraction. It's not that a "ball" is being called with the "advancement of runners." A ball is called because it is the inverse of what happens when the batter isn't ready in time (strike).

The pitch itself isn't illegal. The delay of game is illegal.
__________________
Kill the Clones. Let God sort them out.
No one likes an OOJ (Over-officious jerk).
Realistic officiating does the sport good.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 09:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 150
NCAA Rule 10.2.3 is a timing violation as in 10.18 and not an illegal pitch. The same rational is applied to a batter that has ten seconds to step into the batters box, effect a strike is called.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCAA softball pitching rules Tru_in_Blu Softball 8 Mon Jun 22, 2009 05:14pm
NCAA Pitching Lines Explained FullCount Softball 6 Sun May 03, 2009 03:42pm
NCAA Pitching Lane lines Steve M Softball 15 Mon Apr 06, 2009 01:49pm
NCAA Pitching TexBlue Softball 3 Mon Jun 06, 2005 01:05pm
NCAA pitching shipwreck Softball 6 Fri Apr 02, 2004 09:59pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1