SB - BR play #3

[kono]

Originally posted by SamNVa
Really Tom? I don't remember intent being required. Must be that pesky Old-Timer's disease kicking in
SamC

My wife tells me it's called CRS

I'm still having problems with the original interference call - only because it is the obstuction that caused the interference. F3 comes charging in like a bull in a china shop and scares the bejezus out of the runner who attempts to avoid getting steamrolled (okay - I may be exagerating a bit) and bumps the catcher. As long as I don't see intent, I don't think I can find anything more than a train wreck between BR and F2. The "interference" was caused by the obstruction - that has to be the prevailing infraction. If the ball is caught though - it's an out, plain and simple.

-(thickheaded??) Kono