|
Tue May 06, 2003, 04:21pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cecil,
I can certainly see your point, after all, that's the way I called it on the field. I was just trying to explain why Mike's suggested solution could be correct as well. Either way, you end up with 2 outs and a runner on 2nd and I'm willing to bet that no one except possibly another umpire is going to know or even care which runner ends up there.  SamC 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
