![]() |
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
NFHS:
Not enough information in play description to determine if an initial play is being made. Therefore answer will be given for both: with and without an initial play being made. With an Initial play being made: 2-47-3 INITIAL PLAY ... A fielder is considered to be making an initial play on a fair batted ball when she: a. Has a reasonable chance to gain control of a ground ball that no other fielder (except the pitcher) has touched. b. Has a reasonable chance to catch the ball in flight or catch the ball in flight after it touches another fielder. c. Fails to gain control of the batted ball and is within a step and a reach (in any direction) of the spot of the initial contact. If any of the above is true, use Rule 8-6-10 (The Runner Is Out) ... The runner interferes: a) with a fielder attempting to make the initial play on a fair batted ball. PENALTY: The ball is dead and the runner is out. Each other runner must return to the last base touched at the time of the interference. When a runner is called out for interference, the batter-runner is awarded first base and credited with a fielder's choice. Without an Initial play being made (Deflective Ball): Use rule 8-8-6 (Runner Is Not Out)... A runner is hit with a fair batted ball after it touches, or is touched by, any fielder, including the pitcher, and the runner could not avoid contact with the ball. Play on. |
|
|||
Quote:
Like I noted, we have all been raised to not watch the ball, but run to the base while watching and listening to your coach(es). R1 leaves 1B, sees F4 head toward middle, then all of a sudden, change direction by 150 degrees and runs right at the runner. I just cannot see placing the onus on the runner to adjust to the defense because the pitcher failed to stop the ball.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
I don't get the exception for the pitcher there either. But it's in their rule and in their case book...still don't like it.
I had a deflected ball play come up this weekend. Runner on first, ground ball hit to F4. Ball takes a hop and catches her in the chest, then rolls several feet away, directly in the baseline and directly toward second base. F4 turns and chases the ball and gets to it just a the runner gets to her. They get tangled up and F4 bobbles the ball a couple more times. By the time she controlled it, the runner had reached second and stopped. Defensive coach starts crying for an interference call because his fielder was "fielding the ball". Sorry, coach...nice try... |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Unfortunately, only in my mind.
![]() I'm all for calling obstruction and signalling it whenever you see it, even when it's inconsequential to the play and won't have an award attached to it. If you see it...call it. But what happened on this one was they tangled up really close to second base, I paused about a split second to make sure I saw what I thought I saw, in my mind I said to myself, "That's not interference", and a split second later the runner was stopped on the bag and the fielder was standing next to her holding the ball. Essentially, the play ended before I could throw my left arm out. About a second later I thought to myself, "I should have signalled obstruction". I guess I could have thrown my arm out at that point, but the play was over and it seemed kind of moot. Then the coach started in on me...I did explain to him why I didn't call interference and why it would be obstruction. Last edited by BretMan; Mon Dec 12, 2011 at 06:36pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
8-8-6 has nothing to do with the play as described. I thought: Quote:
![]() |
|
|||
Yeah, me too.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Did not read how far the ball traveled toward F6, (1 foot, 2 feet, 5 feet, 10 feet, etc.???). All we know is that the ball went toward F6. Beyond a step and a reach from the first touch spot, 8-8-6 is used.
Last edited by Tex; Mon Dec 12, 2011 at 06:38pm. Reason: Added footage |
|
|||
Quote:
It is about a runner interferreing (or not) with a fielder fielding a deflected ball. 2) Step and reach does not apply here since we are talking ball. But if it helps, the ball was deflected well away from the pitcher. It was not a "muff" nor an "error". F6 was trying to gain control of a ball that had been deflected by the pitcher. |
|
|||
Thanks for the additional information that was missing. "F6 was trying to gain control of a ball that had been deflected by the pitcher". What you have now describes the definition of "Initial Play 2-47-3-A"
2-47-3 INITIAL PLAY ... A fielder is considered to be making an initial play on a fair batted ball when she: a. Has a reasonable chance to gain control of a ground ball that no other fielder (except the pitcher) has touched. Call is interference per rule book in NFHS. Last edited by Tex; Tue Dec 13, 2011 at 01:14pm. Reason: Added NFHS |
|
|||
Quote:
Don't you think Quote:
"F6 trying to gain control of a ball that had been deflected by the pitcher". ![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
interference on deflected batted ball | shipwreck | Softball | 2 | Wed Jul 06, 2011 03:29pm |
NFHS obstruction/interference | RKBUmp | Softball | 29 | Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:18am |
Interference/Deflected off the pitcher | jwwashburn | Softball | 12 | Sun Jun 29, 2008 06:48am |
Obstruction/interference on batted ball | tibear | Baseball | 10 | Fri Apr 25, 2008 07:43am |
Deflected ball and interference | WestMichBlue | Softball | 10 | Tue Oct 18, 2005 06:33pm |