The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 25, 2003, 10:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Re: Mike

Quote:
Originally posted by oppool
Do appreciate your help on clearing up the ruling and hope ASA will state the ruling clearly in the rule book next year. That was my big problem was there is no where in the rule book where it states the OUT for USC in the book. Have to say I agree with some of the others in that I dont care for the extra penalty issued to the offense on the USC call but we will call them as told


Thanks again

Don
Don,

I'm not particularly happy there is no reference other than the case book. But mine is not to reason why. The boss says make the call when appropriate, I make the call when appropriate. He says cite the case book play, I will cite the case book play.

ASA softball is what it is. You get paid to work THEIR game, not your or my game.

I, too, hope that this is handled in the proper manner in the next year.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1