![]() |
|
|
|||
Obstruction question
ASA rules in force.
runner is approaching 3rd on a hit to the outfield. Ball is thrown from CF to 3rd trying to get runner. Throw is on the way and a little off line. 3rd baseman moves to be able to catch the ball and bumps the runner. No play is made and runner is safe at 3rd. Umpire calls obstruction and awards home. First place she wasn't getting home to begin with and secondly I do not believe this is obstruction since fielder is trying to move to receive the throw that is on the way. Please advise. |
|
|||
F5 did not have possession of the ball, and was not making a play on a batted ball, so, yes, it was obstruction. As far as the base award, that is umpire judgment of what base the runner would have achieved had there been no obstruction. You may disagree with his judgment, but it was his judgment.
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
B) Obstruction - "The act of a defensive team member that hinders or impedes a batter's attempt to make contact with a pitched ball or that impedes the progress of a runner or batter-runner who is legally running the bases, unless the fielder is in possession of the ball, is fielding a batted ball or is about to receive a thrown ball. The act may be intentional or unintentional." For clarification purposes, "1. The defensive player must be in the process of catching the ball and not merely positioning, waiting for a throw to arrive. 2. The act may be intentional or unintentional."
"about to receive a thrown ball" this is my problem with the call |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||
Really.....please help me out then. I am not a softball guy and that is why I am asking for thoughts. I saw this online, but did not see a date?? If you can post the current reading I would appreciate it. Thanks!
|
|
|||
No, your problem is that you apparently have an ASA rule book that is five or six years out of date!
![]() (Or, possibly, you looking at a rule other than ASA's.) They removed the phrase "about to receive a thrown ball" several years ago- it no longer applies. A fielder gets no protection from an obstruction call if she is positioned to catch the ball, but impedes the runner BEFORE gaining possession of it. It's sounds like this was obstruction. The base award...doesn't sound right. A coach could have questioned the umpire about the award. If he said it was "his judgment" that the runner would have reached home, well then, that's his judgment (it might not necessarily be good or sound judgment!) and you're stuck with it. If he told the coach something like "obstruction is an automatic one base award"...then you have a misapplied rule. The next thing out of your mouth should be, "I want to file a protest". Last edited by BretMan; Mon Apr 11, 2011 at 09:52pm. |
|
|||
Gotcha....thanks for that very concise clarification about the rule change. That tells me what I needed to know. When I looked it up online because of my belief it was an incorrect call, that is the first thing I saw. Next, I found this board that appeared to give reasonable replies to rule questions. Looks like I got what I was hoping to find. I appreciate the help!!
|
|
|||
Quote:
But yes, goodbook, it is obstruction in ASA. If the umpire believes that the runner would have gotten a particular base (even home plate) had there been no obstruction, then that is the award. And glad we could help. ![]()
__________________
Dave I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views! Screw green, it ain't easy being blue! I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again. |
|
|||
I was thinking 2005 or 2006 off the top of my head...and didn't bother to go digging through my "Rule Book Library".
![]() |
|
|||
More than that!!!
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
2010 ASA Rule Book (haven't got this years copy yet)
Definition of obstruction in rule 1 is as already described above - no mention of thrown ball. Rule 8-5-B also says fielder must have ball or be fielding batted ball ... ... but 8-5-B-4 says in sentance b.: the fielder "Is attempting to field a batted or thrown ball". Leading to some confusion on my part as this would seem to argue against the other definitions. Am I missing something? Is there some specific case being clarified in 8-5-B-4? |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
HTBT as far as the award.......but I am not going to take away anything from the umpire in question. He/she saw something ![]() Joel |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Obstruction Question | MountieSB | Softball | 37 | Tue Jul 13, 2010 05:03pm |
Obstruction question. | Illini_Ref | Baseball | 10 | Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:48pm |
Another Obstruction Question(s). | THREE | Softball | 15 | Fri Jun 20, 2008 09:22am |
Obstruction question | JPhanatic | Softball | 6 | Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:53pm |
Question on obstruction | dsimp8 | Softball | 37 | Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:35am |