![]() |
|
|||
|
I'm a little surprised by some of these responses.
First, the recent and repetitive rule changes to eliminate intent as a factor, and to rule on the action itself; yet several here are basing their response on a perceived lack of intent. Second, the most comparable rule relating to an inappropriate action by an offensive player would certainly be a blocked ball by offensive equipment; again, intent is disregarded, has no bearing on the outcome, the only decision is interference (runner closest to home is out, all other runners return to last base touched), or simply a blocked ball/dead ball, and all runners return to last base touched. You simply cannot allow the offense to benefit from an illegal and/or inappropriate act that denies the defense a fair opportunity to make a play. Any other consideration is missing the boat.
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Complimentary gate admissiion to ASA national event | DTQ_Blue | Softball | 11 | Wed Aug 11, 2010 02:34am |
| Swinging Gate Plays | mcarr | Football | 8 | Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:44pm |
| A-11 Offense ?? | TXMike | Football | 203 | Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:43pm |
| A-11 Offense in Illinois | golfdesigner | Football | 20 | Thu Aug 14, 2008 02:06pm |
| Whose gate is it? | SC Ump | Softball | 8 | Tue Apr 18, 2006 08:25pm |