Who Bats Next Inning? (FED)

[StLouBlue]

R3, 2 outs. B4 hits pop foul near 3B line. R3 interferes with F5's attempt to catch the ball, and consequently it falls to the ground foul. 8-6-10-b says R3 is out, which ends the inning.

Who bats first in the next inning? B4 or B5?

[MD Longhorn]

B5. B4 completed their at bat. (If you have trouble agreeing with that - what would have you done with B4 had there been no interference? You'd have put B4 on first base, not back in the batters box.) This is no different from B4 hitting into a fielder's choice and not making it to 1st before the out is called... they still don't bat again.

[youngump]

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

B5. B4 completed their at bat. (If you have trouble agreeing with that - what would have you done with B4 had there been no interference? You'd have put B4 on first base, not back in the batters box.) This is no different from B4 hitting into a fielder's choice and not making it to 1st before the out is called... they still don't bat again.

If there had been no interference why would you put B4 on base? They just hit a foul ball.
________
properties for sale Pattaya

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by youngump

If there had been no interference why would you put B4 on base? They just hit a foul ball.

Ugh. Well that was just dumb. Incomplete reading on my part. And my logic was off too... what I meant to say was - what would you have done with B4 had there been less than 2 outs. There's where the answer comes from.

[AtlUmpSteve]

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

Ugh. Well that was just dumb. Incomplete reading on my part. And my logic was off too... what I meant to say was - what would you have done with B4 had there been less than 2 outs. There's where the answer comes from.

And we have established in a current thread that there is a clear and concise rule for interfering with the catch of a routine foul fly; both the runner and batter are out. Even if you don't need that fourth out, the batter has completed the at-bat, and would no longer be up.

[Big Slick]

Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve

And we have established in a current thread that there is a clear and concise rule for interfering with the catch of a routine foul fly; both the runner and batter are out. Even if you don't need that fourth out, the batter has completed the at-bat, and would no longer be up.

Steve, I believe you are quoting an unique variation of ASA rules. NFHS (and NCAA) both treat interference on a foul fly ball as only the runner out, not the batter.

The OP has asked for the FED interpretation.

[StLouBlue]

Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve

And we have established in a current thread that there is a clear and concise rule for interfering with the catch of a routine foul fly; both the runner and batter are out. Even if you don't need that fourth out, the batter has completed the at-bat, and would no longer be up.

Could you cite the rule? I can't find it.

What confuses me is that if the 3rd base coach had interfered, the batter is out (7-4-12) and clearly B5 bats first next inning. But if R3 interferes, it doesn't seem like B4 has completed her "Time at Bat" as defined in 2-60, which says, "The time at bat is the period beginning when a batter first enters the batter's box and continues until she is put out or becomes a batter-runner." So that makes it seem like B4 would bat again. But that seems inconsistent with the 3rd base coach scenario. Hence, I asked the question on this forum.