The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 22, 2010, 07:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlevoix, MI
Posts: 50
Interferrence?

Happened today in a Varsity Game.

R1 on 1st, R1 leaves the base on the pitch, B2 Pops up to F3 who ends up standing over the base to make the catch, effectively blocking R1 from returning to the base unless she dives or slides back.

What can R1 do to get to the base. Is there interference if R1 makes contact with F3 while she is attempting to catch the ball?

Thanks
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 22, 2010, 08:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmielke View Post
What can R1 do to get to the base.
Go around?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 23, 2010, 12:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In the Desert....
Posts: 826
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Go around?
Youre slipping, Mike

YES, there can be interference on the runner if there is contact....or even if there isn't....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 23, 2010, 06:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlevoix, MI
Posts: 50
Ok same situation but R1 never leaves the base. Can R1 be called for interference?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 23, 2010, 09:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Go around?
To where?

The OP said: . . F3 who ends up standing over the base
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 23, 2010, 01:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
To where?

The OP said: . . F3 who ends up standing over the base
Go back and read the entire scenario.

Quote:
R1 on 1st, R1 leaves the base on the pitch, B2 Pops up to F3 who ends up standing over the base to make the catch, effectively blocking R1 from returning to the base unless she dives or slides back.
Here is a contradiction. How can R1 be blocked if there is an exception? To me, this is saying that R1 CAN return to the base if she dives or slides back.

To start, there is no way anyone can be standing over a base and block access from all sides, so let's assume Tom means F3 is blocking access from the direction of 2B. That means some other side of the base must be available, even more so if a double-base is in use. Hence, the answer to the question is to "go around" the fielder and access the base from another angle.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 23, 2010, 06:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlevoix, MI
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Go back and read the entire scenario.




To start, there is no way anyone can be standing over a base and block access from all sides, so let's assume Tom means F3 is blocking access from the direction of 2B. That means some other side of the base must be available, even more so if a double-base is in use. Hence, the answer to the question is to "go around" the fielder and access the base from another angle.
You have the situation correct with no double base.

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 23, 2010, 08:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Go back and read the entire scenario.



Here is a contradiction. How can R1 be blocked if there is an exception? To me, this is saying that R1 CAN return to the base if she dives or slides back.

To start, there is no way anyone can be standing over a base and block access from all sides, so let's assume Tom means F3 is blocking access from the direction of 2B. That means some other side of the base must be available, even more so if a double-base is in use. Hence, the answer to the question is to "go around" the fielder and access the base from another angle.
A real stretch.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 23, 2010, 10:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
A real stretch.
Really? It is a stretch to think that one player cannot block an entire base while standing over it?

Okay, if you say so.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 24, 2010, 10:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
Didn't you answer your own question?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tmielke View Post
Happened today in a Varsity Game.

R1 on 1st, R1 leaves the base on the pitch, B2 Pops up to F3 who ends up standing over the base to make the catch, effectively blocking R1 from returning to the base unless she dives or slides back.


Tom
Looks to me you already know her options!
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 24, 2010, 10:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
A real stretch.
Unless we're talking about an enormous firstbaseman, SITTING on the bag waiting to make this catch, I don't see this as a stretch at all. In fact, what he describes is what I saw in my head while reading the initial post.

Anyway - the answer to your question sans sarcasm or silliness is that the runner MUST AVOID interfering with the catch. What she has to do to get back is her problem to solve.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 24, 2010, 10:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 281
Send a message via AIM to charliej47 Send a message via MSN to charliej47 Send a message via Yahoo to charliej47
Wink Vacating their base

USSSA/ASA/NFHS/NSA/PONY/BABE: Runner must vacate or provide sufficient space a fielder needs to make a play on a ball - except for the legally occupied BASE.
__________________
Charles Johnson Jr
NFHS Class #1 softball/baseball
ASA/USSSA
Dayton, Ohio

I have been umpiring so long that it was called Rounders when I started.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obstruction??? or Interferrence Just Curious Softball 15 Sat Apr 21, 2001 09:26am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1