Interferrence?

[Rich Ives]

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

Go back and read the entire scenario.



Here is a contradiction. How can R1 be blocked if there is an exception? To me, this is saying that R1 CAN return to the base if she dives or slides back.

To start, there is no way anyone can be standing over a base and block access from all sides, so let's assume Tom means F3 is blocking access from the direction of 2B. That means some other side of the base must be available, even more so if a double-base is in use. Hence, the answer to the question is to "go around" the fielder and access the base from another angle.

A real stretch.

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by Rich Ives

A real stretch.

Really? It is a stretch to think that one player cannot block an entire base while standing over it?

Okay, if you say so.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by Rich Ives

A real stretch.

Unless we're talking about an enormous firstbaseman, SITTING on the bag waiting to make this catch, I don't see this as a stretch at all. In fact, what he describes is what I saw in my head while reading the initial post.

Anyway - the answer to your question sans sarcasm or silliness is that the runner MUST AVOID interfering with the catch. What she has to do to get back is her problem to solve.