![]() |
Taping over the knob (ASA)
This has been brought up at a couple of our clinics, and the room was divided.
ASA 3-1-B states: Quote:
The concern is a valid one: bat doctors often go in through the safety knob to remove the safety rod, endload bats, or do other wonderful things to the bat. Taping over the safety knob can hide the signs that a bat has been doctored, potentially putting players at risk. However, I maintain that with the rule written in its current form, there is nothing that we can do to prohibit taping over the knob. What say you all? |
Quote:
Since the knob was one to the two cited primary entrance points to alter a bat, a change in the rule was proposed to eliminate taping the knob two years ago and never made it out of any committee. The author of the change noted that allowing the knob to be taped permitted concealment of unauthorized access to the inside of the bat. |
Quote:
It's not vague. It's in black and white. |
ask yourself how taping over a knob can be of any advantage or harm, or could affect play.
|
Quote:
Sure, the bat doctors can go in that end, and the tape might cover that. You might note that the other point of entry still requires an endcap; using the same logic, we should keep that endcap off so we can see if it has doctored there, too. But the rule is equally clear on that; to be considered legal, the endcap must be on, and appear to have been on since the factory. |
Quote:
I rarely ask myself any such question about any aspect of the game. I have heard that logic used too many times to justify not making a call that really should have been made. My concern is what do the rules of the association I am working for say is proper or improper. |
it's possible that a player innocently taped up a loose knob thinking it's fine to do so. I think they make those rules to limit legal liability of us umpires, assuming, tape = hiding something underneath. even if we ask players to remove the original manufacturers grip, which a good bat doctor would put back undetectable, do most umpires really know what is underneath? most doctoring occurs thru the endcap anyways.
umpiring is always done with judgment, not void of it. why don't you ask questions? last year, knobcuffs where illegal. this year, it's all good. someone asked some questions, hence the change. Quote:
|
Quote:
ASA drew the line in the sand with respect to taping the safety knob. It's allowed. And yes, I have a pretty good idea what's underneath a stock grip. Varies from model to model. |
most, not all. I wouldn't take it personally, dave. just because I said most have never taken off a grip, doesn't mean you haven't.
Quote:
|
Quote:
Unless, of course, you make it personal. |
Quote:
But...that's okay that you didn't get it. |
what I meant was, and I'll wager, most umps have never seen a bat with the original grip off to know what to look for. that's all I meant. I didn't mean to suggest that you would or wouldn't know if that's how it came off to you.
Quote:
|
what I missed, was why you said, "I rarely ask myself any such question about any aspect of the game". maybe I'm wrong, but that seems robotic to take rules at face value. I think asking and questioning is healthy for the game. it's a dynamic game that keeps changing.
Quote:
|
Quote:
ASA edits the rules. We don't. If you want a rule change, propose it later this fall or in your local leagues. Until then, stick with the rules AS WRITTEN, or you'll end up floating up $h1t creek without a paddle. |
the rules are the rules. some umpires don't even check bats.
what part of the rule are you suggesting is being changed by "me", as in, if "I" want to change the rules? I mentioned questioning rules is healthy, enforcing rules is required. have you had your coffee today? Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45pm. |