The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Nov 07, 2009, 01:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
Putting runners on 2B and 1B for the tiebreaker doesn't make sense to me. If the defense wants to set up that force with an intentional walk, they can always do so.

As far as the height of the pitch goes, it's going to be difficult no matter what the rule is. Changing to 10 feet with no lower limit might be going from the frying pan into the fire. The good pitchers are going to push the limits just as they do now.

Drop awarded base from IP? Yes! People might actually start calling IPs.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Nov 07, 2009, 04:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 157
in vegas, they do 70' bases for SP and it really speeds the game up, very few infield hits, more outs on the bases. plus, assuming the IF dirt is now 5' deeper, IFers can play back more and get to more balls.

i wasnt sure about the metal spikes.... are you saying they are proposing allowing them in ASA and you are ok with that?

IMO its a very serious safety issue to not allow metal spikes, probably more serious than illegal bats.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Nov 07, 2009, 06:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveshane67 View Post
...IMO its a very serious safety issue to not allow metal spikes, probably more serious than illegal bats.
The high school girls seemed to manage ...
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Nov 07, 2009, 04:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by greymule View Post
Putting runners on 2B and 1B for the tiebreaker doesn't make sense to me. If the defense wants to set up that force with an intentional walk, they can always do so.

As far as the height of the pitch goes, it's going to be difficult no matter what the rule is. Changing to 10 feet with no lower limit might be going from the frying pan into the fire. The good pitchers are going to push the limits just as they do now.

Drop awarded base from IP? Yes! People might actually start calling IPs.

in coed, walking a guy with a girl on deck is 2 bases so its not always possible to set up that force.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Nov 07, 2009, 05:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
IMO its a very serious safety issue to not [?] allow metal spikes, probably more serious than illegal bats.

Naturally, it's possible to be badly cut by metal spikes. I once saw my third baseman's tendon and bone after a play, and it was 100% accident. But in actual practice, injuries from metal spikes are very rare.

Hot bats, I think, pose greater dangers, including death, facial disfigurement, and brain damage. From behind the plate, I saw the career of a high-level pitcher end on a line drive off his foot. We had tried to ban the Miken Ultra before the tournament, but the company threatened to sue and even sent a representative to make sure we allowed the bat.

Yes, Steve. I forgot completely about coed rules.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Nov 07, 2009, 06:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by greymule View Post

Yes, Steve. I forgot completely about coed rules.
Who cares about co-ed rules, the TB is not used in co-ed softball.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 08, 2009, 11:57am
Ref Ump Welsch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Who cares about co-ed rules, the TB is not used in co-ed softball.
Since when? Or are you just being scarcastic?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 08, 2009, 12:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ref Ump Welsch View Post
Since when? Or are you just being scarcastic?
Since ever?

ASA 5.11, the Tie Breaker Rule is used only by Women's & JO Girls FP, Men's 40+ and 45+ FP and Men's Senior SP
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 08, 2009, 01:23pm
Ref Ump Welsch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Since ever?

ASA 5.11, the Tie Breaker Rule is used only by Women's & JO Girls FP, Men's 40+ and 45+ FP and Men's Senior SP
Sorry, wasn't familiar with the tiebreker's limits in FP. I'm a SP guy.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sat Nov 07, 2009, 11:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by greymule View Post
IMO its a very serious safety issue to not [?] allow metal spikes, probably more serious than illegal bats.

Naturally, it's possible to be badly cut by metal spikes. I once saw my third baseman's tendon and bone after a play, and it was 100% accident. But in actual practice, injuries from metal spikes are very rare.

Hot bats, I think, pose greater dangers, including death, facial disfigurement, and brain damage. From behind the plate, I saw the career of a high-level pitcher end on a line drive off his foot. We had tried to ban the Miken Ultra before the tournament, but the company threatened to sue and even sent a representative to make sure we allowed the bat.

Yes, Steve. I forgot completely about coed rules.
i figured you forgot, wasnt trying to sound snobby...

the metal spike thing kills me bc of the other rules ASA has in place for safety reasons that, IMO, are way over the top. maybe its fine for "major" players but for the weeknight rec league its beyond stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 08, 2009, 12:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveshane67 View Post
...maybe its fine for "major" players but for the weeknight rec league its beyond stupid.
Local leagues can ban metal with a local rule (and many probably will if this passes). The official ASA rule would only come into play in championship play.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 08, 2009, 03:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
Local leagues can ban metal with a local rule (and many probably will if this passes). The official ASA rule would only come into play in championship play.
Adults have always been allowed to wear metal spikes except for co-ed and senior.

Twenty years ago EVERYONE was allowed to wear metal spikes.

This change is directed toward JO players.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proposed NCAA Rule Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 14 Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:13am
Proposed ASA Rule Changes #1 IRISHMAFIA Softball 107 Thu Nov 06, 2008 02:14am
Proposed Rule Changes, ASA? IRISHMAFIA Softball 47 Fri Sep 07, 2007 01:36pm
Proposed ASA Rule Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 8 Mon Oct 11, 2004 07:09pm
Proposed Rule Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 22 Wed Oct 06, 2004 02:49pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1