View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 08, 2009, 07:12am
mach3 mach3 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Germany
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
Stupid. The idea of the tie breaker rule is to generate offense to break the tie. It is SUPPOSED to favor the offense. Jeez... do people think these things through or is it just some coach with a bug up his butt about his last game...
There was the same proposal for the ISF-Rules this year, submitted by the ISF Secretary General. They argued it would place the Visiting Team in an advantage since they could IBB the first batter to get the force play if they need to defend a single run to score.

Quote:
REASON FOR CHANGE:
Under the current rule, the visiting team if it does not score can walk the first batter to set up a force and to create a double-play situation. The home team cannot do this for the fear that both runners will score and then they will one have one running in the bottom on the inning. Another advantage is the possibility of more than one run scoring, which should require less extra innings.
But it was not accepted.

Raoul

Last edited by mach3; Sun Nov 08, 2009 at 07:30am.
Reply With Quote