The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 13, 2009, 03:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dholloway1962 View Post
So what was the true reasoning given for not allowing College Girls play 18G? Who was the big lobby for that change?
So Cal coaches tired of the fact that they no longer dominate 18G.

The other huge driving fact.. the fact that many coaches and parents too simply want 18G to be a showcase division (hence the reason for a big end of year showcase through premier) and not a competitive division.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 17, 2009, 05:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem View Post
So Cal coaches tired of the fact that they no longer dominate 18G.

The other huge driving fact.. the fact that many coaches and parents too simply want 18G to be a showcase division (hence the reason for a big end of year showcase through premier) and not a competitive division.
I am a SoCal parent. Never been a softball ump or a coach.

How does the elimination of college players address the issue in your first statement?

John
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Nov 07, 2009, 10:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
There are a couple requiring JO infielders and pitchers to wear masks? Failure results in a bench restriction and can no longer participate in the game.

Sorry, but I consider this over officiating and this this decision is one for the coaches, players and parents, not ASA.

Penalty for a player not wearing a mask during warm ups is a bench restriction for the player and coach.

Sorry, but I consider this over officiating and this this decision is one for the coaches, players and parents, not ASA. Not to mention it is impossible to enforce equally across the board.
Definitely agree. Facemasks for batters was one thing, but this is entirely another. I certainly would recommend to 1st and 3rd basemen playing fastpitch to wear mouth guards and heart guards, but to require such things is over the line.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Exposed jewelry must be removed and may not be worn during a game.

IMO, this change is also over officiating. I am not telling a 35 year old man or woman they MUST remove their wedding band. The rule presently in place works just fine and I see no reason to exacerbate an all ready tenuous situation in ASA softball.
This would be an OK rule for JO... maybe. But to require this of adults is way over the line. They're perfectly capable of assessing the dangers of wearing jewelry.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Change the tie breaker to place runners 1st & 2nd for the purpose of creating a possible force out for the defense.

Give me a break, that is the idea of a tie breaker.
Agree with Irish.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Drop awarded base from the IP enforcement.

Penalty is too severe. No argument from me.
Also agree with greymule. Now we might actually see the IP's being called.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 09, 2009, 10:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Numerous scenarios in changing the FP distance to 43'.
I have no problem with this rule. Eventually, everyone will be pitching from this distance.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Safety Grip: Covers the handle region of the bat. The safety grip will not be less than 10 inches and not more thn 15 inches. There shall be no exposed metal in the 10-15 inch area. The safety grip may be a molded finger formed grip as long as it is permanently attached to the bat or attached with Safety tape. Resin, pine tar or spray substances are permissible on the safety grip only. Any tape applied to the safety grip must be sa continuous spiral. A bat having a flare or cone shaped grip attached is legal
Seems totally contradictory to all the safety mumbo jumbo we have been hearing about for years.


Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
There are a couple requiring JO infielders and pitchers to wear masks? Failure results in a bench restriction and can no longer participate in the game.
Totally ridiculous, yet not wholly unexpected. I really wish that ASA would learn what is mommy and daddy territory, and what is the domain of the "Governing Body of Softball." These "feel good" rules are totally unnecessary, but I feel are probably brought on my parental pressure and manufacturing interests.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Penalty for a player not wearing a mask during warm ups is a bench restriction for the player and coach.
Then hire an official, whose sole duty it is to peruse the various corners, back alleys and what not around a complex to insure that this rule is being applied properly. Otherwise, leave it alone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Exposed jewelry must be removed and may not be worn during a game.
The one thing that I really don't like is being the jewelry police. If they want this rule in, then make sure to put the onus for its enforcement on the coach by making the penalty the coaches' immediate removal from the game. Otherwise, leave as it is already written.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
[Numerous suggestions concerning metal spikes in particular classes of ASA JO softball.
No problem. Better traction = safer playing conditions. I really don't think that you will see a lot of JO players or coaches honing their spikes to pull a "Ty Cobb."

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
JO ball to allow one or two EPs
Heck, let's just let em all play. Sure would make line-up management easier!

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Change the tie breaker to place runners 1st & 2nd for the purpose of creating a possible force out for the defense.
I really want to meet the "mental giant" who conceived of this rule change.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
During between inning warm ups, restrict the defense to 4 IF & 1 ball.
Does this include the pitcher and the catcher? If so, we are basically looking at the pitcher doing their warm-ups and then a F4 and F6 standing around until a throw down??? Makes no sense. This safety conciousness is getting out of hand. One must allow for some liability/responsibility on the part of the players and coaches, or in the case of JO, players, coaches and parents.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
[GMAFB! We have more to worry about issues which directly affect the game. Maybe whe should have NASA scan the skies every half inning to insure a wayward meteor will not fall near a field.
Ain't that the truth?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
[Drop awarded base from the IP enforcement.
Why not just do away with the whole IP thing altogether? Or simplify it. While I agree that the penalty is severe as written, I don't think that this will cause any more IP's to be called. I think the women/girls (in FP) should have the exact same rules and or accepted conventions that the men have. One foot or two feet in contact with the pitching plate, their choice, and a leap with the toe down allowable. A replant being illegal. Also, there is way too much concern about the touching of hands...etc. I feel like it shouldn't matter whether or not a pitcher takes the PP with hands together or not, as long as there is a pause to take a sign (or to simulate same) before the hands separate and the pitch starts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
[Allow Adult FP players to select the OD circle they prefer to avoid a possible fould ball.

Really don't care, but IMO they are acking for trouble.
Yeah, they are acking for it all right!


Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
[Edited for some clarification and typo corrections
You sure about that?????
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 09, 2009, 02:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Define "Errant throw" as "A thrown ball which draws the defender away from the area of the play or base at which a play is being made"


Withdrawn

Quote:
Safety Grip: Covers the handle region of the bat. The safety grip will not be less than 10 inches and not more thn 15 inches. There shall be no exposed metal in the 10-15 inch area. The safety grip may be a molded finger formed grip as long as it is permanently attached to the bat or attached with Safety tape. Resin, pine tar or spray substances are permissible on the safety grip only. Any tape applied to the safety grip must be sa continuous spiral. A bat having a flare or cone shaped grip attached is legal


This passed in Equipment Certification!


Quote:
Changing the required ball requirments to a .520 cor an a 275.0 lbs of compression.


Equipment Certification shot this one down.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 09, 2009, 02:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
So wait, are you saying that flare/cone grips will be legal in 2010? Knobcuffs, Grip 'n' Rip, etc., will be okay? Done deal?
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 09, 2009, 04:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp View Post
So wait, are you saying that flare/cone grips will be legal in 2010? Knobcuffs, Grip 'n' Rip, etc., will be okay? Done deal?
Nothing is a "done deal" until Thursday.

But the way the change reads:

Safety Grip: Covers the handle region of the bat. The safety grip shall not be less than 10 inches and not more than 15 inches. There shall be no exposed metal in the 10-15 inch area. The safety grip may be a molded finger formed grip as long as it is permanently attached to the bat, or attached with Safety tape. Resin, pine tar or spray substances are permissible on the safety grip only. Any tape applied to the safety grip must be continuous spiral. A bat having a flare or cone shaped grip attached is legal.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 06:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
The following are the rule changes that will be presented to the General Council tomorrow as approved:

Change 16U & 18U FP to 43' pitching distance

Change base distance for Men's Adult SP (excluding Seniors) to 70'

Permit the Safety Base to be any color contrasting with white

Clarified a legal bat which includes a flare/cone at the knob end of the handle

Allow JO 16U & 18U FP to wear metal spikes

Eliminated "heating" from the Note restricting the changing of the characteristics of equipment

Change the rule to return all runners to their previous base ANYTIME the BR is determined to be an Unreported Substitute prior to the next pitch.

Change 4.7.C.5 from banning "communication equipment" to "electronic equipment" from the dugout. This includes video cameras.

Include "Modified" in the rule allowing the pitcher to use a drying agent

Allowed Modified to use a courtesy runner for the pitcher and catcher similar to that of the FP game.

The following are some of the proposed changes rejected, but may be resurrected on during General Council:

Changing the pitching distance to 53' for all adult SP except Seniors

Changing the base distance to 70' for all adult SP except Seniors and Masters

Changing the pitch height in SP to 6-10 feet

Allowing a courtesy foul in SP when the batter starts with a 1-1 count
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 06:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Without any disagreement with Mike, here is what I posted on my local messageboard:

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve
The one Code item everyone is focused on regards college players playing in youth. The current status is the one remaining proposal would ban them only from Gold, and it includes even club team players, as well as JUCO, etc. That one passed Legislative with a slim split vote, and will surely be debated again tomorrow at the General Council. Because it passed at the Committee, it will take a 60% majority to overturn the passage (an interesting turn, in that it now means that 40% + 1 is a majority???). Several Code proposals to move the Gold National around the country have passed.

The same situation exists regarding metal cleats; now passed the Rules Committee by a slim majority for all 16U and 18U levels. Pitching changes for all 18U and 16U levels to 43' appears well in hand; 14U just isn't going to happen this year. Proposals to mandate face guards have failed miserably; as have proposals to disqualify catchers (and/or the head coach) if they are observed warming up pitchers without masks. A proposal to allow EP's also failed badly, as well as allowing on deck batters to either side. Efforts to match the high school and college requirement to draw the bat back on a bunt also appears doomed. One proposal to ban any electronic equipment not used solely for scorekeeping appears like it will pass (someone used video cameras and playback in the dugout).

When I say failed badly, there were unanimous subcommittee rejections, and the Rules Committee could not muster a motion and second to even vote with almost 50 voting members present. Those items with split votes will almost assuredly be rebattled by the General Council.

For those interested in adult slow pitch, there were split votes on 1) moving adult bases to 70' to give infielders more time to make a play (approved), 2) dropping the arc from 12' to 10' to match other associations (failed), and adding a courtesy foul (failed).
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 07:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Sounds pretty good. Interesting is all the hubbub at the 18Gs about the grip attachements only to (probably) have it changed this year.

Good to see the cleat changes.

I think the pitching distance change is what parents/coaches think they want not realizing how badly most of their pitchers struggle even at 40'. I think they think their pitchers are better than they are. This change will help the top pitchers and hurt the vast majority of mediocre pitchers.. but if its what they want, oh well.

I experienced it several times last weekend with teams playing up to 18's expecting me to adjust my zone so their mediocre pitchers could get a strike.

Banning electrical equipment sounds like an unnecessary PITA.

I guess no news on whether the 18gs will be moving around?
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 07:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem View Post
I guess no news on whether the 18gs will be moving around?
Actually, 3 different proposals, I believe 2 of 3 may have passed.

One has it always being voted on and awarded like every other tournament. Second has it on OKC every 3rd year, with the Executive Director placing it in the off years.

The one I believe failed had it in OKC every 5th year, with the other 4 voted on and awarded.

Pretty sure one of the two will be the final outcome; surprising to me, #2 seems the favorite. Will be fought, as some want the membership to make all such decisions, and not give up any opportunities.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 07:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem View Post

I guess no news on whether the 18gs will be moving around?
Actually, Steve addressed that.

The change was to allow the Executive Director designate the location.

At the time, I was sitting with a particular ASA member whom I believe has an inside track. One of the Past Presidents jokingly mentioned "trusting" RR to place the tournament around the country, including the possibility of Altoona, PA.

I turned to this individual and said, "I see it more like a rotation of Anaheim, OKC & Orlando".
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 10:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Actually, Steve addressed that.

The change was to allow the Executive Director designate the location.

At the time, I was sitting with a particular ASA member whom I believe has an inside track. One of the Past Presidents jokingly mentioned "trusting" RR to place the tournament around the country, including the possibility of Altoona, PA.

I turned to this individual and said, "I see it more like a rotation of Anaheim, OKC & Orlando".
He could throw Georgia a bone. If it wasnt for their weather, that place aint half bad.

As long as we dont have to go to Texas, least of all Midland.. its all good though.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 11:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Permit the Safety Base to be any color contrasting with white
How about also contrasting with the ground? Any color includes tan, brown, faded orange, etc.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 11:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
How about also contrasting with the ground?
Well, that would throw out Orange bases here, with our clay.
__________________
Just Tryin' to Learn...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proposed NCAA Rule Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 14 Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:13am
Proposed ASA Rule Changes #1 IRISHMAFIA Softball 107 Thu Nov 06, 2008 02:14am
Proposed Rule Changes, ASA? IRISHMAFIA Softball 47 Fri Sep 07, 2007 01:36pm
Proposed ASA Rule Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 8 Mon Oct 11, 2004 07:09pm
Proposed Rule Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 22 Wed Oct 06, 2004 02:49pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1