The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 28, 2002, 02:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by Steve M
ASA's doggone list. I know it's expensive to replace the bats, but ASA got gutless this year with the list. I think we should commend the way the Fed handled this - no seal on the bat means the bat is not legal period. I really do not want the responsibility of deciding whether or not a bat would have met the standard. I could probably accept dealing with that list again, but take this third acceptance critereon away.

Steve M
No argument from me and I've told every ASA official I know the exact same thing for the past year.

The Fed held by the rule and did fine.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1