|
Wed May 27, 2009, 09:02am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Presuming that the IP was called for illegal positioning after the umpire idiotically allowed it, that is a terrible call. In fairness though, we dont know what the IP was called for. The article is not specific, not to mention they lie.
edit I guess the article DOES state that the ump ruled the strategy illegal.. What puzzles me is why he supposedly allowed it, then called the IP. Smells fishy in the world of coach and press lies.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS Last edited by wadeintothem; Wed May 27, 2009 at 09:06am. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
