The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 08, 2002, 11:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Re: Hey Mike....

Quote:
Originally posted by NC_Blue
I would suppose (By your apparent response on the "Other" board...lol) that you disagreed w/ my stance on this issue (Or...maybe not). It seems like the way Henry is trying to teach this.....would cause MORE injuries than allowing the UMPIRES to determine what "Errant" means....and rule based on THEIR interp.

Just my $.02...

If you'd care to expound....further than what is posted above, Mike (Or anyone)....I'd appreciate it.

Jeff
I believe it would be less of a threat of a collision. If F3 knows they can get an out, I believe they would be more likely to attempt to keep contact with the base. If there is no out to be had, it would benefit the defense if F3 abandoned the base to stop the ball, thus removing themselves from the BR's path.

BTW, this isn't an interpretation, it is what was always meant to be, but bad wording caused umpires to believe otherwise.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1