Quote:
Originally posted by NC_Blue
I would suppose (By your apparent response on the "Other" board...lol) that you disagreed w/ my stance on this issue (Or...maybe not). It seems like the way Henry is trying to teach this.....would cause MORE injuries than allowing the UMPIRES to determine what "Errant" means....and rule based on THEIR interp.
Just my $.02...
If you'd care to expound....further than what is posted above, Mike (Or anyone)....I'd appreciate it.
Jeff
|
I believe it would be less of a threat of a collision. If F3 knows they can get an out, I believe they would be more likely to attempt to keep contact with the base. If there is no out to be had, it would benefit the defense if F3 abandoned the base to stop the ball, thus removing themselves from the BR's path.
BTW, this isn't an interpretation, it is what was always meant to be, but bad wording caused umpires to believe otherwise.