![]() |
|
|||
|
I really can't understand why that would be. It seems that the rules all have some underlying purpose of protecting either the offense or the defense. especially rules with exceptions or special situation like IFF. This exception makes no sense (to me yet) if it is not to protect the BR from an int. call after being declared (or even assumed) out on strikes. Why protect the offense that runs when they arenot supposed to run or penalize the defense that throws the ball away reacting to the errant play of the offense. I know they are supposed to be aware of the game situation.
I don't know anyone on any rules committees who could explain this so if you could please just let me know so that I could understand why the exception is not the runner allowed to run with 3K and is that there is no penalty for running when they clearly are prohibited from being eligible from reaching base by rule. I am not trying to be a smart bohiney but I don't understand.
__________________
TCBLUE13 NFHS, PONY, Babe Ruth, LL, NSA Softball in the Bible "In the big-inning"
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Here is another situation | REFVA | Basketball | 16 | Mon Jul 31, 2006 10:54am |
| 8.7 SITUATION A | assignmentmaker | Basketball | 12 | Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:44am |
| A no win situation | schwinn | Football | 3 | Sat Oct 01, 2005 11:36am |
| Help With This Situation | coachmjw | Basketball | 18 | Thu Jan 02, 2003 03:17pm |
| Another .3 second situation | williebfree | Basketball | 11 | Sun Dec 22, 2002 09:06pm |