|
|||
Quote:
Oh, welcome to the board g&z glen
__________________
glen _______________________________ "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." --Mark Twain. |
|
|||
Purist...
Although it didn't come into play in this CWS (since Texas did not lose), there has not been an "official" CWS (IMO) since the NCAA buckled to TV and did away with the "if" game.
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
Re: Purist...
Quote:
team come from losers bracket and beat the undefeated, there should definiately be another game....As stated it was not necessary this year, buttttt.. glen
__________________
glen _______________________________ "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." --Mark Twain. |
|
|||
The NCAA has arranged the brackets into two independent double elimination brackets & the championship is decided by a single game between the two bracket winners.
This was probably done to avoid the embarassing situation of the champion and the runner-up having a 1-1 head-to-head record in the tournament. Technically, then, South Carolina did not come from the losers bracket and Texas from the winners bracket. SC had to win the "if" game against Clemson to win their bracket. They both were champions of their brackets. But even so, if SC had won the game, both teams would have had only 1 loss, but SC would have been crowned the champion. If they think the double-elimination format is too confusing to the TV audience, how about a 3 game series between the 2 bracket winners?
__________________
Tom |
Bookmarks |
|
|