The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 08, 2008, 11:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
In my judgment, "would have passed" the 2004 test means it is too old to have a stamp of any kind. It has to look old, and it has to be an old bat I recognize.

HS ball is simpler - no stamp, no play for my step 1. The rest is the same.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 08, 2008, 02:56pm
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
In my judgment, "would have passed" the 2004 test means it is too old to have a stamp of any kind. It has to look old, and it has to be an old bat I recognize.
That may work good for you, but for the new (or young) umpire, that proves difficult. They will look at the bat and tell the teams "no stamp no play", only because they don't have the history or experience with the older bats.

Personally, I'd like to see the "no stamp no play," but I understand the intent of the rule with old bats as well.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sports Lists - Officiating Blunders lrpalmer3 Basketball 1 Wed Dec 29, 2004 01:35pm
Using Lists to Rank Officials Green Football 14 Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:27am
Mental check lists for umpires. Mike Simonds Football 11 Thu Jul 18, 2002 06:06pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1