unreported sub NFHS

IRISHMAFIA · #1 (**permalink**) Wed Oct 10, 2007, 04:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MNBlue

I see your distinction, but do you think that the penalty is allowing for multiple simultaneous violators to be encompassed by the warning?

IMO, I don't think so. But, due to the specific wording, I can see how it could be interpretted that way.

How can you have a "next" offender if there was no warning prior to the protest by the offended team?

MNBlue · #2 (**permalink**) Wed Oct 10, 2007, 05:38pm

I don't think you can.

But also, I don't think the rule was intended to allow the violators multiple violations. I think the penalty is poorly written.

Dholloway1962 · #3 (**permalink**) Wed Oct 10, 2007, 06:02pm

I would agree that this is the one situation where you two warnings for the price of one. Can't restrict in the situation given, in my opinion anyway.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Fed unreported sub again	Little Jimmy	Softball	3	Thu Apr 26, 2007 09:37am
unreported sub (fed)	Little Jimmy	Softball	1	Mon Apr 02, 2007 07:30pm
NFHS unreported sub	shipwreck	Softball	2	Wed Aug 30, 2006 07:13pm
Unreported Sub	Stair-Climber	Softball	3	Thu May 12, 2005 02:20pm
NFHS Rules Unreported Sub	whiskers_ump	Softball	9	Wed Feb 06, 2002 11:09am