![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
So, I guess you have no issue with leather ball bags, either. In case you hadn't noticed, there are not too many MLB umpire groupies on this board. Also in case you hadn't noticed, there are not too many here who give a rat's behind what MLB umpires wear. That seems to be an infatuation on the small ball board, I know. But, it is a big "yawn" here.
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
TCBLUE13 NFHS, PONY, Babe Ruth, LL, NSA Softball in the Bible "In the big-inning"
|
|
|||
|
Dakota asked: So, my question: Do you notice a difference in comfort between the two? Do the natural leather shoes flex more easily and breathe better?
Being in the Army for 20+ years has given me the opportunity to apply a bit of polish to leather. Needless to say I was happier than Michael Jackson at Boystown when we switched to suede boots. Our shoes that we wear with our dress and some service uniforms are made of a substance called Corfram mentioned earlier in this post. It is far more comfortable and breathable than old patent leather. I would assume that the shoes sold today as patent leather are actually Corfram and that would make them as good or better than some cheap cuts of leather. It would take a significant emtional event to get me to even consider "patent leather" shoes. I can and do apply a good old fashioned spit shine to my shoes before every game even during tournaments. It's a matter of pride. |
|
|||
|
My last spit shine was in ROTC, and that was (lets just say), some time ago! But, I bet I could still make it shine with the best of 'em. These days, though, I find the Kiwi Parade Polish will brush up to a very nice shine. It won't blind anyone, but it looks very good.
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Here is a brief on the product: Corfam was the first poromeric imitation leather, invented by Lee Hollowell, and introduced by DuPont in 1963 at the Chicago Shoe Show. Corfam was the centerpiece of the DuPont pavilion at the 1964 New York World's Fair in New York City. Its major advantages over natural leather were its durability and its high gloss finish that could be easily cleaned with a damp cloth. Its disadvantages were its stiffness which did not lessen with wearing and its relative lack of breathability. DuPont manufactured Corfam at its plant in Old Hickory, Tennessee from 1964 to 1971. After spending millions of dollars marketing the product to shoe manufacturers, DuPont withdrew Corfam from the market in 1971 and sold the rights to a company in Poland. Corfam is mainly remembered as a textbook marketing disaster. The 1966 Chilean issue of Reader's Digest claimed that by 1983 there would not be enough leather from cows, demand exceeding supply by 30%. Corfam is still used today in some products, an example being certain types of equestrian saddle girth. Corfam shoes are still very popular in the military and other uniformed professions where shiny shoes are an asset. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Tom |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Patent Leather | brainbrian | Basketball | 8 | Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:00pm |
| patent leather? | Snake~eyes | Football | 6 | Thu Feb 24, 2005 02:27pm |
| Patent leather vs. Polished leather | jritchie | Basketball | 21 | Thu Sep 30, 2004 01:50pm |
| Patent Leather?? | Luv4Asian8 | Basketball | 23 | Mon Jul 19, 2004 07:37pm |
| Patent leather.... | chris s | Baseball | 4 | Mon Jul 21, 2003 06:05pm |