interference question

[AtlUmpSteve]

Originally Posted by Dakota

Barring something unstated happening on the base paths (runner asleep, etc.), successful pick-off throws are usually very quick - catch and fire. A delayed pick-off sounds like an afterthought, and perhaps not an actual play being interfered with at all, just a random throw to F3.

Perhaps it is just more common regionally, but I see plenty of cases of a delayed pickoff. Typically, it is used against a more aggressive baserunner that uses (and often fakes using) a delayed steal. So the sequence is 1) runner gets aggressive lead, 2) catcher feints a return throw to pitcher, 3) runner leans toward advance base on the feint, 4) catcher throws behind runner in pickoff attempt.

Actually pretty common here; and it would be interference in my mind if batter out of the box is hit by a throw that appeared on line.

Yes; I did use the same phrase, cutting and pasting on the same question posed on several message boards. I have seen you do the same, Tom.

To answer your question, Mike, I submit that the batter who has left the box is responsible to avoid interference until there is no further play. If runner returns, and/or ball is returned to the pitcher (in the circle), then the batter can safely return. Otherwise, I see a rules basis to hold them accountable for interfering, and no rules basis to hold them harmless without judging no play, or USC, no matter how long the delay by the catcher in making "a play".