The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 02, 2007, 07:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Maryland (northeast of Baltimore)
Posts: 371
on deck batter interference?

This happened today. Fed game. I'm in the field. R1 on second. Batter squares to bunt. She misses with no apparent bat contact. Ball bounces off the backstop over to the on deck batter who bends down, picks it up, and tosses it to the catcher. R1 takes a few steps to possibly try for third but stops maybe twenty feet off second when on deck batter handles the ball. Plate ump calls dead ball and keeps R1 at second because, he says, everyone must have thought it was a foul ball, even though it wasn't. All participants bought it and we moved on.

After the game we discussed the play and neither of us was sure if his ruling could be considered right (even though he sold it). And I've been looking for some type of interference situation involving the on deck batter and so far I'm dry. Can anyone site a Fed rule dealing with the on deck batter handling a live ball?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 02, 2007, 08:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Well, without citing specific rules, we can still have a quality discussion. It is obviously a blocked ball; we have to decide if it interference, or simply blocked and dead ball.

This becomes a judgment; was there a play that the defense had that was hindered by the act? Without a play, that is hindered, there can't be an interference call, by the definition of interference. In this case, the runner (IMO) saved his dumb teammate by not running, in that he took away any play the defense might have made. Unless you are ready to determine that the catcher was ready to pick that runner off 2B, it is reasonable to accept a blocked ball without penalty. If the runner continued, and there was any chance in he!! the catcher has a play, it must be interference.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 02, 2007, 08:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Maryland (northeast of Baltimore)
Posts: 371
I'm looking through the 2006 ASA rulebook and 7-1-D covers this quite clearly. Still can't find a specific Fed rule.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 02, 2007, 10:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Remember, there must be a play with which the player actually interfered with for the umpire to rule interference. 7.1.D specifically requires the umpire to judge that the ODB deprived the defense from making an out.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
On-deck batter Hoosier_Dave Softball 5 Mon Jun 19, 2006 02:10pm
On Deck Batter Duke Softball 4 Fri Apr 30, 2004 02:03pm
Interference on the On-Deck-Batter? jlissner Baseball 3 Thu May 29, 2003 07:17am
On Deck Batter DownTownTonyBrown Baseball 4 Mon May 05, 2003 06:42pm
On-Deck Batter Interference Prince Baseball 6 Mon May 06, 2002 11:09pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1