The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 06, 2001, 03:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
OK - this is a close reading test. The change regarding the BR is obvious.

What is the subtle change?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 06, 2001, 04:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: north central Pa
Posts: 2,360
Dunno that there's too much subtle about it. The real impact of the change is with other runners - they are no under look-back until the batter-runner reaches 1B, too. And, this gives us umps a longer time to look around.
__________________
Steve M
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 06, 2001, 05:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
True, but that is not it. Read carefully - another new condition was added (the words are new at any rate, and it should change the way a certain situation is called, IMO).
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 06, 2001, 06:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
You must be referring to "possession and control of the ball" instead of the "pitcher has the ball".

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 06, 2001, 06:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: north central Pa
Posts: 2,360
#54 To Clarify add the following: T. (Fast Pitch Only) Look Back Rule. The "Look Back" Rule will not be in effect until the batter-runner reaches first base

I must be missing your subtlty, then. Either that or the wording I have on this change isn't the final product. They just clarified when it goes into effect and didn't really change anything that I am awar of.
__________________
Steve M
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 06, 2001, 09:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: woodville, tx
Posts: 3,156
Quote:
Originally posted by Dakota
True, but that is not it. Read carefully - another new condition was added (the words are new at any rate, and it should change the way a certain situation is called, IMO).
The "Look Back" rule will be in effect when the
ball is live, the batter-runner has touched 1B
or has been declared out
, and the pitcher
has possession and control of the ball within
the picther's circle.

Dakota,
Is what you are looking for in this statement?
Speaking ASA?
glen
__________________
glen _______________________________
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things
that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover."
--Mark Twain.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 07, 2001, 12:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Mike got it - possession and control. Previously, ASA only required possession. I seem to recall a discussion a few months back - maybe on another board, but most of you get around - about an article using the NCAA (?) book that if the pitcher held the ball with her knees or under her arm or something like that, that it released the runners, since she no longer had the ball under control.

Looks like ASA is lining up with NCAA on this point. I wonder why this was not in the comments about the rule change?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1