When I'm Wrong, I'm wrong: Interference is better without intent

[SWFLguy]

Ah--more memories. Back when I still had an outside protector (yes--a "raft") with my gear-- I was getting hit all over too. I called for time out--went to my car and brought out the venerable piece of gear. All
the balls bounced off that thing and no more bruises, etc.
I sometimes wish we could still use them.

[wadeintothem]

Originally Posted by SWFLguy

Ah--more memories. Back when I still had an outside protector (yes--a "raft") with my gear-- I was getting hit all over too. I called for time out--went to my car and brought out the venerable piece of gear. All
the balls bounced off that thing and no more bruises, etc.
I sometimes wish we could still use them.

In the shed by this field are a couple of those. I could use it. No problem. Might be a little better than making some little kid who just happens to suck at catcher cry. Next time I see the evil little purple shirts, I'm going to toss it in the dugout just in case.

Damn fine idea!

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by wadeintothem

In the shed by this field are a couple of those. I could use it. No problem. Might be a little better than making some little kid who just happens to suck at catcher cry. Next time I see the evil little purple shirts, I'm going to toss it in the dugout just in case.

Damn fine idea!

Yep, I started umpiring using a balloon and to be quite honest with you, I believe it is a better piece of equipment that what is used today. An umpire does not lose any mobility and in the slot, still has full view of the plate and strike zone.

I think the lack of style is the only reason for not using it.

[Steve M]

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

Yep, I started umpiring using a balloon and to be quite honest with you, I believe it is a better piece of equipment that what is used today. An umpire does not lose any mobility and in the slot, still has full view of the plate and strike zone.

I think the lack of style is the only reason for not using it.

Mike,
I'll drink to that. I started with one of them too. 'Course, I started at 14 & that was more than a couple of years ago. I think they are probably more protective AND I think they are much cooler in those hot & humid games.

[Andy]

Originally Posted by SWFLguy

Ah--more memories. Back when I still had an outside protector (yes--a "raft") with my gear-- I was getting hit all over too. I called for time out--went to my car and brought out the venerable piece of gear. All
the balls bounced off that thing and no more bruises, etc.
I sometimes wish we could still use them.

A buddy of mine facing a similar situation in a rec league game went to the dugout and inquired about the possibility of a new catcher. He was told that the two regular catchers were not there and this one was the only player that would volunteer to catch.

He solved the issue by borrowing a spare mitt from the dugout and using it behind the plate to defend himself.

[mcrowder]

I still have my old bubble protector, and it's in the car during the season. I've pulled it out exactly twice - both times in EXACTLY the situation you describe -- pitcher with good velocity, catcher with no experience and no viable alternative.