The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 01, 2001, 09:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
While the ruling is basically the same, the only problem with using 8.5.1 Situation L has the coach announcing F1 as a re-entry for the PH. Therefore, F1 was indeed the pitcher of record, thus eligible for a CR.

The portion which Bob cited must have been a post-publication change as the 2001 Case Book doesn't read as Bob posted.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1