best authority on Fed. rules?

[whiskers_ump]

Originally posted by Steve M
Dave,
Roger's explanation makes an awful lot of sense to me. Still being tied up with tournament ball, I haven't spent any amount of time on this. Using Roger's explanation, it's sequential. The pitcher must get on the rubber, take a sign, put hands together, separate, pitch. It's sequential and apparently Fed and longer cares about something that happens before the seqence begins. It sounds like a common sense change.

I think - especially for our discussion purposes here, that I'd like to hear why some think that it's an illegal pitch, Dave. See if you can get one or more to explain why it would be an illegal pitch - only using this year's book & case book. I'd have this as a one-on-one discussion - kinda like asking for a special/additional lesson.

Agree wholeheartly...Just did not say it as elegantly
as the above two gentlemen {Steve/Roger}.
I dont think anyone can prove to you that it
is an illegal pitch - not by using the 2001 rule/case book.
2002??????

glen