View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 18, 2001, 08:59pm
Steve M Steve M is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: north central Pa
Posts: 2,360
Dave,
Roger's explanation makes an awful lot of sense to me. Still being tied up with tournament ball, I haven't spent any amount of time on this. Using Roger's explanation, it's sequential. The pitcher must get on the rubber, take a sign, put hands together, separate, pitch. It's sequential and apparently Fed and longer cares about something that happens before the seqence begins. It sounds like a common sense change.

I think - especially for our discussion purposes here, that I'd like to hear why some think that it's an illegal pitch, Dave. See if you can get one or more to explain why it would be an illegal pitch - only using this year's book & case book. I'd have this as a one-on-one discussion - kinda like asking for a special/additional lesson.
__________________
Steve M
Reply With Quote