The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 22, 2006, 03:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bismarck, North Dakota
Posts: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRW
Sounds like a very third-world play, if you ask me. Seems to me the same thing could happen with the runner's finger and the elastic on the wrist of the fielder's batting glove that she wears under her glove...
It may be a "very third-world play" but I've seen stranger things happen from behind the plate and as a player. I don't see a finger getting caught in the wristband of a batting glove if the batting glove is worn properly, i.e. snug to the wrist.
__________________
Thomas Hamkens
North Dakota ASA Umpire
Verlangsamen Sie Wurf weicher Ball ist ein wirklicher Sport
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 22, 2006, 04:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back in TX, formerly Seattle area
Posts: 1,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDblue
It may be a "very third-world play" but I've seen stranger things happen from behind the plate and as a player. I don't see a finger getting caught in the wristband of a batting glove if the batting glove is worn properly, i.e. snug to the wrist.

So...here's a play I had last year.

Runner goes sliding into second base. Throw is a little low, 2B goes way down to get it, lotsa diving and stuff going on. I see the velcro on the back of the runner's batting glove slice open a nice little chunk just above the 2B's eye. Her eye to this day looks as if she ran into barbed wire or something.

The batting glove certainly appeared to be worn properly, i.e. snug to the wrist. It was fastened - I know because she called time out at first base to refasten it on the pitch before this play.

If this play had happened in, say, North Dakota, would we have banned this girl for life? Taken her behind the woodshed?

Stuff happens. IMHO we don't need to be telling folks who are playing world championship level fast pitch that they can't wear a Livestrong bracelet.
__________________
John
An ucking fidiot
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 22, 2006, 05:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDblue
It may be a "very third-world play" but I've seen stranger things happen from behind the plate and as a player. I don't see a finger getting caught in the wristband of a batting glove if the batting glove is worn properly, i.e. snug to the wrist.
What about a face mask? A regular glove. Stirrup socks. Shoe strings. Belt loop. A base strap.

Something could get hung-up on a player's pony tail, so should we make them tuck their hair up under their hat (and went in to ask him why?, "You look like a fine young man, I think you'll do"; So I took off my hat and said, "Imagine that, ME working for you; Whoa oh oh oh, signs, signs, everywhere are signs....oops, sorry for the flashback to the Five Man Electrical Band).

Point is, I just think the "jewelry" thing has gone way over to the tree-hugging extreme. It is not my job to protect people from themselves, I have a hard enough time protecting myself and my family.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 22, 2006, 06:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
A) the jewelry discussion is a hijack
B) an ignored factor in the hijack is whether the item is adornment or functional
C) I will respond to mcrowder tomorrow, in the original track of this topic
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 10:18am
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne
A) the jewelry discussion is a hijack
B) an ignored factor in the hijack is whether the item is adornment or functional
C) I will respond to mcrowder tomorrow, in the original track of this topic
The original topic was, is there anything wrong with the photo. The "jewelry" topic is among something that could be viewed as an issue, along with other things mentioned. My post, I'll determine if something was hijacked or not.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 10:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRW
The original topic was, is there anything wrong with the photo. The "jewelry" topic is among something that could be viewed as an issue, along with other things mentioned. My post, I'll determine if something was hijacked or not.
Sorry, just trying to make this topic and others easier to follow.

What were you after in the OP?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 11:22am
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne
What were you after in the OP?
Anything discussion that makes us think about our judgement, and how it differs amongst ourselves.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 10:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bismarck, North Dakota
Posts: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
(and went in to ask him why?, "You look like a fine young man, I think you'll do"; So I took off my hat and said, "Imagine that, ME working for you; Whoa oh oh oh, signs, signs, everywhere are signs....oops, sorry for the flashback to the Five Man Electrical Band).
Or the more popular version by Tesla.
__________________
Thomas Hamkens
North Dakota ASA Umpire
Verlangsamen Sie Wurf weicher Ball ist ein wirklicher Sport
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 10:29am
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Question

Thought...

Why are some people so worked up over the Armstrong Bracelets, but not worked up over wrist sweat bands?

For instance:
Another Cat Photo too large to post...
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 10:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRW
Thought...

Why are some people so worked up over the Armstrong Bracelets, but not worked up over wrist sweat bands?

For instance:
Another Cat Photo too large to post...
Is that a sweat band or a string bracelet on the right wrist? Neither the string bracelet or the cancer band is allowed in NFHS and elsewhere, except NCAA, I would be more likely to ban the string than the smooth cancer band. If that is a soft sweat band below her elbow sleeve, it is specifically allowed in all rules.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.

Last edited by CecilOne; Fri Jun 23, 2006 at 10:39am.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 11:20am
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne
Is that a sweat band or a string bracelet on the right wrist? Neither the string bracelet or the cancer band is allowed in NFHS and elsewhere, except NCAA, I would be more likely to ban the string than the smooth cancer band. If that is a soft sweat band below her elbow sleeve, it is specifically allowed in all rules.
You'll note my OP specifically stated, "speaking ASA". Discussing NCAA or NFHS rules on this is a hijack.

As previously mentioned, ASA leaves "dangerous jewelry" up to the discression of the umpire. That's why this topic interests me... some think the Armstrong bracelet is dangerous, others don't. I haven't seen anything that really sways me personally to the "it's dangerous" side of the discussion. All I've seen is the 'what if something got tangled up' discussion. Not good enough for me, personally.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 12:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back in TX, formerly Seattle area
Posts: 1,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRW
You'll note my OP specifically stated, "speaking ASA". Discussing NCAA or NFHS rules on this is a hijack.

As previously mentioned, ASA leaves "dangerous jewelry" up to the discression of the umpire. That's why this topic interests me... some think the Armstrong bracelet is dangerous, others don't. I haven't seen anything that really sways me personally to the "it's dangerous" side of the discussion. All I've seen is the 'what if something got tangled up' discussion. Not good enough for me, personally.
SRW,
Is it ok to discuss ISF, since that's what rule set they'll be playing under, and our friend Lori will be umpiring?

(Not that I know anything about ISF other than what I read...)



BTW sports fans, it is supposed to be in the 70s for the second consectuive day in Seattle. Summer may very well arrive before July 4th this year!
__________________
John
An ucking fidiot
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 11:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDblue
Or the more popular version by Tesla.
Maybe in your world, not even close in mine.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 12:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bismarck, North Dakota
Posts: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Maybe in your world, not even close in mine.
Mike, you may have me in the knowledge of softball but when it comes to music, just let it go... I've been in the music business in one way or another for the better part of 20 years, with the last 19 of them being a mobile DJ (weddings, anniversaries, reunions, etc). Talk to anybody that is less that 45 years old and I would suspect 90%+ of them have never heard of the Five Man Electrical Band since the only real hit for them was "Signs". They had a minor hit with "Hello, Melinda Goodbye" but I doubt you'll find very many people that remember that song. Tesla's cover of "Signs" gave it life again and was a decent hit for them.

Sorry for the hijack of this thread!!! If anybody ever wants to discuss music, let me know and I'll be happy to oblige.
__________________
Thomas Hamkens
North Dakota ASA Umpire
Verlangsamen Sie Wurf weicher Ball ist ein wirklicher Sport
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 01:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northeastern NC
Posts: 487
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by NDblue
Mike, you may have me in the knowledge of softball but when it comes to music, just let it go... I've been in the music business in one way or another for the better part of 20 years, with the last 19 of them being a mobile DJ (weddings, anniversaries, reunions, etc). Talk to anybody that is less that 45 years old and I would suspect 90%+ of them have never heard of the Five Man Electrical Band since the only real hit for them was "Signs". They had a minor hit with "Hello, Melinda Goodbye" but I doubt you'll find very many people that remember that song. Tesla's cover of "Signs" gave it life again and was a decent hit for them.

Sorry for the hijack of this thread!!! If anybody ever wants to discuss music, let me know and I'll be happy to oblige.
I had the 5 man version on a K-tel Record
Back then, it was da bomb. Exclamation
__________________
TCBLUE13
NFHS, PONY, Babe Ruth, LL, NSA

Softball in the Bible
"In the big-inning"

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:03am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1