I should know the answer, but . . .

[greymule]

Thanks for the answers, guys. Yes, in F I meant that the IFR was not called and also that the runners were aware of the non-call.

mcrowder posted: In all of these but B and F, you should put Able and Baker on 2nd and 3rd, Charles is out.

I assume you meant Abel and Baker on 2B and 1B (right?).

So in the case of an IFR non-call, you can call it retroactively and correct an unfair mess that you caused.