View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 24, 2005, 04:15pm
mcrowder mcrowder is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Here's the problem, Dakota...

In both, Umpire doesn't call IFF, but realizes immediately afterward that it should have been called.

Sitch A - R1 and 2 on 2nd and 1st, no outs. Pop up in the infield is dropped and booted, runners advance, batter safe.

Sitch B - R1 and 2 on 2nd and 1st, no outs. Pop up in the infield is dropped then fielded cleanly, Force out at 3rd, Force out at 2nd. Batter safe.

You are saying to "fix" this in B, but not in A.

If you'd called IFF in A, you'd have 1 out, runners on 2nd and 3rd. If you'd called IFF in B, you'd have 1 out, runners on 1st and 2nd.

So if you only fix B, but not A, then in either case, the umpire incorrectly not calling IFF harms the defense, and costs them an out. It is an inequitable way to "fix" things. It is imperative that we fix our mistake in as equitable way as possible.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote