|
|||
I know I know this whole subject has been kicked around more than whether OJ did it or not, but here is a question.
I was talking with a knowledgeable player. Wait did I say that? Allow me to re-phrase. A "talkative player that does seem to get some of the rules. Much better. We were discussing the obstruction rule and I was first impressed because he was the first player I have ever spoken with that actually knew of the rule change. I love tangents. Can you tell? Anyway, he stated that it is obstruction if a fielder without the ball is stradling the bag, this would be obstruction. I told him I didn't beleive this was correct. In my opinion, stradling the bag is not blocking the players access to the bag. Alright, hit me with you best shots.
__________________
"We are what we repeatedly do, therefore Excellence is not an act but a Habit." |
|
|||
I believe that in most cases stradling the base would be obstruction. If stradling the base without the ball gets in the way of the runner rounding the bag, I might give that runner the next base if I felt the runner had a chance to get there. Also, if stradling the base without the ball causes the runner to slow down on the way to that base, I will probably protect that runner to that base.
|
|
|||
Quote:
If a defender stradles the bag, but gives the runner full access, this is not OBS as long as it is not impeding the progress of the runner.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Speaking ASA,
The rule reads (8-5-B)That the fielder must impede the progress of the runner. Stradling the base without the ball as a runner tries to round the bag would certainly be obstruction. However stradling the base waiting for a throw/tag would not be, as long as the defender was not stradling the bag in such a way to block the runners path to the base. J.L. Merriman |
Bookmarks |
|
|