The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 01, 2005, 07:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
I thought it had been brought up several times why 99% of the world feels the NZ interpretation, as posted here, is giving a great advantage to the defense.

To simplify to it's purest form - in every other code except NZ's interp, if a batter hits a ball that would have been a double, and is then OBS - she's going to be awarded second base. So anywhere but NZ, the runner is not penalized for getting crashed into.

In NZ - if a batter hits what would have been a double, and is then crashed into, falls, and only makes it to first, you are only giving her first base. Obviously, this creates a huge advantage to the defense for obstructing.

Next time I'm coaching in NZ ( ), I'm coaching my first baseman that anytime she sees an obvious extra-base hit (especially a likely triple or homer), she needs to hinder the runner as much as possible before BR reaches first base, as there is no penalty. Catcher and pitcher should pitch in - perhaps a 2-man screen in front of first base, with the catcher grabbing from behind.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1