Double Obstruction

[Dukat]

Originally posted by mcrowder
I'm still interested on hearing more opinions on whether we can (or should) take the 1st OBS into account into our reasoning at the time where we decide what the 2nd/3rd OBS protection should be. I admit I'm conflicted.

I think you must! As a rule it says your judgement "had there been no obstruction". So with that said, once the second and third obstructions happened then you can by rule "judge" what would have happened had obstruction not occured at all the 1st, 2nd or 3rd times.